HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Better performance with bone-anchored hearing aid than acoustic devices in patients with severe air-bone gap.

AbstractOBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS:
A study performed in the 1990s with analogue linear hearing aids showed that in patients with mixed hearing loss and an air-bone gap that exceeded 25 to 30 dB, speech perception was better with a bone-anchored hearing aid (Baha) than with a conventional behind-the-ear (BTE) device. The objective of the present study was to investigate whether this conclusion applies to today's digital BTEs with feedback cancellation and whether the crossover point still occurs at an air-bone gap of 25 to 30 dB.
STUDY DESIGN:
Case control.
METHODS:
Experienced unilateral Baha users with the latest digital Baha processors were fitted with a powerful BTE with feedback cancellation. After an acclimatization period of 4 weeks, aided thresholds and speech recognition scores were determined and compared to those recorded previously with the Baha. To obtain patients' opinions, a disability-specific questionnaire was used. Participants comprised 16 subjects with bilateral mixed hearing loss participated
RESULTS:
Audiometric and speech recognition data showed similar trends to those described previously, but the crossover point had shifted to an air-bone gap of 30 to 35 dB. In the questionnaire, the BTE was rated higher than the Baha, except by the patients with an air-bone gap that exceeded an average of 45 dB.
CONCLUSIONS:
In patients with mixed hearing loss whose air-bone gap exceeded 35 dB, speech recognition is likely to be better with a Baha than with a BTE. Therefore, the Baha should receive greater consideration when mixed hearing loss is combined with a significant air-bone gap, even when there are no contraindications for BTEs.
AuthorsMaarten J F de Wolf, Sander Hendrix, Cor W R J Cremers, Ad F M Snik
JournalThe Laryngoscope (Laryngoscope) Vol. 121 Issue 3 Pg. 613-6 (Mar 2011) ISSN: 1531-4995 [Electronic] United States
PMID21344443 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
CopyrightCopyright © 2010 The American Laryngological, Rhinological, and Otological Society, Inc.
Topics
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Algorithms
  • Audiometry, Pure-Tone
  • Auditory Threshold
  • Bone Conduction
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Female
  • Hearing Aids
  • Hearing Loss, Conductive (diagnosis, rehabilitation)
  • Hearing Loss, Mixed Conductive-Sensorineural (diagnosis, rehabilitation)
  • Hearing Loss, Sensorineural (diagnosis, rehabilitation)
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
  • Speech Reception Threshold Test
  • Suture Anchors

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: