HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Neoplastic pericardial disease in lung cancer: impact on outcomes of different treatment strategies. A multicenter study.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Local (intrapericardial) chemotherapy has been reported to be useful for the treatment of neoplastic pericardial disease, but it has never been compared to systemic chemotherapy, a combination of the two and simple pericardial drainage or sclerosis.
METHODS:
We analyzed the clinical and echocardiographic data of 119 patients, suffering of neoplastic pericarditis due to lung cancer (97 with non-small-cell), comparing the outcomes of four different treatment strategies (extended catheter drainage/sclerosis, systemic chemotherapy, local chemotherapy, and combined - local plus systemic - chemotherapy) at the last available follow-up or at the change of therapy after a treatment failure. The outcomes (based on semiquantitative evaluation of pericardial disease) were classified as complete, partial, no response and progressing disease.
RESULTS:
A complete response was achieved in 37/53 of patients with combined, in 12/22 with local, in 5/27 with systemic chemotherapy, respectively, and in 4/17 after drainage/sclerosis (p<0.001). Overall response was achieved in 51/53 with combined, 18/22 and 16/27 with local or systemic chemotherapy, respectively, and in 5/17 with drainage/sclerosis only (p<0.001). Survival was significantly better after combined chemotherapy (p<0.001) and 12/53 patients (23%) in this subgroup survived more than 1 year. The overall response rate was higher with intrapericardial cisplatinum than with other agents (98% vs 80%, χ(2)=7.69, p<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS:
Local chemotherapy, alone or with systemic chemotherapy, is effective in treating pericardial metastases from lung carcinoma, leading to a good control of pericardial effusion in 92% of cases, and to complete disappearance of effusion and masses in 65%. Combined therapy is significantly better than any other treatment. Pericardiocentesis and intrapericardial chemotherapy should be used whenever possible in lung cancer neoplastic pericardial disease, not only in case of tamponade.
AuthorsChiara Lestuzzi, Alessandra Bearz, Christos Lafaras, Renata Gralec, Eugenio Cervesato, Witold Tomkowski, Marzia DeBiasio, Elda Viel, Theodoros Bishiniotis, Dimitrios N Platogiannis, Angela Buonadonna, Lucia Tartuferi, Rita Piazza, Salvatore Tumolo, Massimiliano Berretta, Francesco Santini, Massimo Imazio
JournalLung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (Lung Cancer) Vol. 72 Issue 3 Pg. 340-7 (Jun 2011) ISSN: 1872-8332 [Electronic] Ireland
PMID21122938 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Multicenter Study)
CopyrightCopyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Topics
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung (diagnosis, physiopathology, secondary, therapy)
  • Catheterization
  • Combined Modality Therapy
  • Disease Progression
  • Echocardiography
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Heart Neoplasms (diagnosis, physiopathology, secondary, therapy)
  • Humans
  • Lung Neoplasms (diagnosis, pathology, physiopathology, therapy)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pericardial Effusion
  • Pericarditis
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: