HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Is directly measured low-density lipoprotein clinically equivalent to calculated low-density lipoprotein?

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) can either be calculated or measured directly. Clinical guidelines recommend the use of calculated LDL-C (C-LDL-C) to guide therapy because the evidence base for cholesterol management is derived almost exclusively from trials that use C-LDL-C, with direct measurement of LDL-C (D-LDL-C) being reserved for those patients who are nonfasting or with significant hypertriglyceridemia.
OBJECTIVE:
Our aim was to determine the clinical equivalence of directly measured-LDL-C, using a Siemens Advia Chemistry System, and fasting C-LDL-C.
METHODS:
Eighty-one subjects recruited for two cholesterol treatment studies had at least one C-LDL-C and D-LDL-C performed simultaneously; 64 had a repeat lipid assessment after 4 to 6 weeks of therapy, resulting in 145 pairs of C-LDL-C and D-LDL-C.
RESULTS:
There was significant correlation between D-LDL-C and C-LDL-C (r² = 0.86). Correlation was significantly better in those with lower total cholesterol, triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein. In 60% of subjects, the difference between D-LDL-C and C-LDL-C was more than 5 mg/dL and greater than 6%. Clinical concordance between D-LDL-C and C-LDL-C was present in 40% of patients, whereas clinical discordance was noted in 25%. One-third had greater than a 15 mg/dL difference between D-LDL-C and C-LDL-C, whereas 25% had a greater than 20 mg/dL difference. In 47% of subjects, the difference between D-LDL-C and C-LDL-C at baseline and follow-up changed by a minimum of 10% or 10 mg/dL.
CONCLUSIONS:
Our findings suggest that D-LDL-C is not clinically equivalent to C-LDL-C. This puts into question the current recommendation of using D-LDL-C in situations in which C-LDL-C would be inaccurate.
AuthorsLawrence Baruch, Sanjay Agarwal, Bhanu Gupta, Ann Haynos, Swapna Johnson, Katelyn Kelly-Johnson, Calvin Eng
JournalJournal of clinical lipidology (J Clin Lipidol) 2010 Jul-Aug Vol. 4 Issue 4 Pg. 259-64 ISSN: 1933-2874 [Print] United States
PMID21122658 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.)
CopyrightPublished by Elsevier Inc.
Chemical References
  • Anticholesteremic Agents
  • Cholesterol, LDL
  • Lipoproteins, HDL
  • Lipoproteins, LDL
  • Triglycerides
  • Cholesterol
Topics
  • Aged
  • Anticholesteremic Agents (therapeutic use)
  • Blood Chemical Analysis (methods)
  • Cholesterol (blood)
  • Cholesterol, LDL (blood)
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hypertriglyceridemia (drug therapy)
  • Lipoproteins, HDL (blood)
  • Lipoproteins, LDL (blood)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Therapeutic Equivalency
  • Triglycerides (blood)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: