HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Interferon and lamivudine combination therapy versus lamivudine monotherapy for hepatitis B e antigen-negative hepatitis B treatment: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
It has been demonstrated that only a minority of patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) obtain a sustained response after either interferon (IFN) or nucleos(t)ide analogue monotherapy. Therefore, combination therapy of drugs with synergistic antiviral effects was proposed to have a sustained response in these patients. We compared the effect and safety of lamivudine monotherapy and its combination with IFN including conventional interferon (CON-IFN) and pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) for HBeAg-negative CHB patients.
DATA SOURCES:
A group of three independent reviewers identified 9 eligible randomized controlled trials through electronic searches (MEDLINE, OVID, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library Clinical Trials Registry, and the Chinese Medical Database), manual searches, and contact with experts. Sustained virological and biochemical responses were defined as primary efficacy measures. We performed quantitative meta-analyses to assess differences between CON-IFN plus lamivudine combination and lamivudine monotherapy groups.
RESULTS:
No greater sustained virological and biochemical rates were found in patients receiving CON-IFN/lamivudine combination therapy [29.1% vs. 26.7%, odds ratio (OR)=0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-1.50, P=0.94, and 41.8% vs. 40.3%, OR=1.13, 95% CI 0.78-1.65, P=0.51, respectively], though a reduced YMDD mutation rate was achieved in the combination group [8.39% vs. 30.0%, OR=0.16, 95% CI 0.076-0.33, P<0.001]. However, data from one PEG-IFN trial showed greater sustained virological and biochemical rates in patients receiving combination therapy [response rate 19.5% vs. 6.6%, OR=3.42, 95% CI 1.71-6.84, P<0.001 and 60.0% vs. 44.2%, OR=1.88, 95% CI 1.23-2.85, P=0.003, respectively].
CONCLUSIONS:
Addition of CON-IFN to lamivudine did not improve treatment efficacy but suppressed YMDD mutation by lamivudine. Combination of PEG-IFN and lamivudine might increase the sustained response, and further clinical trials are needed for confirmation.
AuthorsYu Shi, Yi-Hua Wu, Zhe-Yue Shu, Wan-Jun Zhang, Jun Yang, Zhi Chen
JournalHepatobiliary & pancreatic diseases international : HBPD INT (Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int) Vol. 9 Issue 5 Pg. 462-72 (Oct 2010) ISSN: 1499-3872 [Print] Singapore
PMID20943454 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Antiviral Agents
  • Drug Carriers
  • Hepatitis B e Antigens
  • Interferon alpha-2
  • Interferon-alpha
  • Recombinant Proteins
  • Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
  • Lamivudine
  • Polyethylene Glycols
  • peginterferon alfa-2a
Topics
  • Antiviral Agents (administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
  • Drug Carriers
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Hepatitis B (drug therapy)
  • Hepatitis B e Antigens (blood)
  • Humans
  • Interferon alpha-2
  • Interferon-alpha (administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
  • Lamivudine (administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
  • Polyethylene Glycols (administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Recombinant Proteins
  • Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (administration & dosage, therapeutic use)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: