HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

[A comparative study of nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma].

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
METHODS:
A total of 134 patients with renal carcinoma without metastasis in lymphatic system and distant sites were recruited. In random, 69 cases of renal cell carcinoma were elected for nephrectomy and the others radical nephrectomy. The operating time, blood loss, fasting time, postoperative hospital stay, information of tumor recurrence and metastasis, survival time without tumor, survival rate and perioperative complication were compared between two groups.
RESULTS:
In cases of nephrectomy, the operating time ranged from 60 - 135 minutes and blood loss 70 - 100 ml. In 4 cases, membrana pleuro-peritonealis was damaged. The fasting time ranged from 6 - 24 hours and postoperative hospital stay 5 - 8 days; the staging of all 69 cases was detected; follow-up studies ranged from 5 - 15 years, finding 1 case tumor metastasis in adrenal body and 1 case recurrent tumor in cases of radical nephrectomy, operating time ranged from 105 - 185 minutes and blood loss 150 - 2000 ml. Membrana pleuro-peritonealis was breached in 3 cases. The fasting time ranged from 12 - 90 hours and postoperative hospital stay 8 - 12 days. The staging of all 65 cases was detected. Follow-up studies of 5 - 15 years revealed 1 case of tumor metastasis in brain and 1 case of recurrent tumor. There was no significant difference in perioperative complication, tumor recurrence, tumor metastasis and survival time without tumor between those two groups (P > 0.05). The blood loss, operating time, fasting and postoperative hospital stay were less than that in radical nephrectomy group (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION:
In patients without metastasis in lymphatic system and distant sites, nephrectomy is both effective and safe. It has the advantages of a short operating time, a short postoperative hospital stay and less damage and blood loss than radical nephrectomy.
AuthorsHong-yuan Yu, Bai-kang Chen, Xian-jun Zhang, Fei-ping Li, Tian-ji Wang, Chong-biao Ding, Song-jiang Wu, Zi-wen Lu, Mang Ke, Wen-gang Zhang
JournalZhonghua yi xue za zhi (Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi) Vol. 90 Issue 16 Pg. 1120-2 (Apr 27 2010) ISSN: 0376-2491 [Print] China
PMID20646431 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, English Abstract, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
Topics
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Carcinoma, Renal Cell (surgery)
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Kidney Neoplasms (surgery)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nephrectomy (methods)
  • Survival Rate
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: