HOMEPRODUCTSSERVICESCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaMobileSign Up FREE or Login

Urinary fistulae after partial nephrectomy.

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
To report the risk factors and natural history of urinary fistula (UF) after partial nephrectomy (PN), as their incidence has been reported to be 3-6% in large series of PN but there are few reports of the risk factors associated with the development of UF after PN, and the natural history of UF in a large group of patients.
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
This was a retrospective review of 1118 PN at one tertiary-care institution. Most patients had a drain placed in the perinephric space after surgery. Fifty-two patients were identified as having a UF if they had persistent flank drainage for >14 days after surgery, or presented with evidence of a UF after the drain had been removed. Risk factors for development and the course of the UF are reported.
RESULTS:
Fifty-two patients developed a UF after PN (4.4%, 95% confidence interval, CI, 3.5-6.1%) The rate of a persistent urine leak (defined as drain fluid consistent with urine for >2 weeks after surgery) was 4.0 (95% CI 2.9-5.3)%. The overall rate of delayed UF presentation was only 0.4 (0.09-0.9)%. Patients who developed a UF had larger tumours (3.5 vs 2.6  cm, P= 0.03), a higher estimated blood loss (400 vs 300  mL, P < 0.001), and longer ischaemia time (50 vs 39  min, P < 0.001) than patients who did not develop a UF. Differences in tumour histology, laterality, multifocality, type of surgery (laparoscopic vs open), and intraoperative collecting system entry were not statistically different in patients who did or did not develop a UF. Patients with tumours of >2.5  cm were twice as likely to develop a UF than patients with tumours of <2.5  cm (P= 0.02). Most patients were managed conservatively with a percutaneous drain until the UF resolved, if they were asymptomatic. Overall, in 36 patients (69%) the fistula resolved with no intervention, while 16 (31%) required intervention. Stenting was the commonest intervention (15%). No patient required re-operative open surgery.
CONCLUSION:
The rate of development of UF after PN is low. Tumour size, blood loss and ischaemia time were all associated with the development of a UF. In most patients with a urine leak immediately after surgery the UF will resolve with no intervention, and can be managed conservatively with patience, in the absence of clinical symptoms.
AuthorsShilajit D Kundu, R Houston Thompson, George J Kallingal, Gina Cambareri, Paul Russo
JournalBJU international (BJU Int) Vol. 106 Issue 7 Pg. 1042-4 (Oct 2010) ISSN: 1464-410X [Electronic] England
PMID20230384 (Publication Type: Journal Article)
Copyright© 2010 THE AUTHORS. JOURNAL COMPILATION © 2010 BJU INTERNATIONAL.
Topics
  • Aged
  • Drainage
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Kidney Neoplasms (surgery)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nephrectomy (adverse effects, methods)
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Urinary Fistula (etiology)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research network!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password: