HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Short periodic applications of the vacuum-assisted closure device cause an extended tissue response in the diabetic mouse model.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
The vacuum-assisted closure device is a widely used mechanical modulator of wound healing; however, the optimal time kinetics of application have not been determined. The objective of the study was to optimize the kinetics of vacuum-assisted closure application.
METHODS:
Full-thickness wounds in seven diabetic mice per study group were treated with either an occlusive dressing alone, the vacuum-assisted closure device for 6 or 12 hours, or the vacuum-assisted closure device periodically for 4 hours every other day or continuously for 7 days. Wound closure and tissue response were evaluated by macroscopic, histologic, and immunohistochemical analyses on day 7.
RESULTS:
Wound closure was significantly faster after short initial vacuum-assisted closure (6-hour and 12-hour groups) when compared with continuous treatment. Increased granulation tissue formation was seen in the 12-hour group (2.4-fold increase) and in those treated periodically for 4 hours every other day (3.2-fold increase) compared with the dressing-alone controls. Significant stimulation of cell proliferation was seen after all vacuum-assisted closure patterns (3.6- to 5.3-fold increase), whereas angiogenesis was augmented only after the device was applied for either three times for 4 hours (4.3-fold) or continuously (4.7-fold) when compared with dressing-treated wounds. Treatment three times for 4 hours showed a superior angiogenic effect also when compared with short initial applications (6-hour and 12-hour groups).
CONCLUSIONS:
Short vacuum-assisted closure treatment induced an extended biological response in the wound. A total of 12 hours of periodically applied vacuum-assisted closure reached a similar wound tissue response as continuously applied vacuum-assisted closure for 7 days. These findings suggest new clinical approaches for mechanical wound-healing devices.
AuthorsSandra Saja Scherer, Giorgio Pietramaggiori, Jasmine C Mathews, Dennis P Orgill
JournalPlastic and reconstructive surgery (Plast Reconstr Surg) Vol. 124 Issue 5 Pg. 1458-1465 (Nov 2009) ISSN: 1529-4242 [Electronic] United States
PMID20009831 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article)
Chemical References
  • Biomarkers
  • Ki-67 Antigen
  • Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1
Topics
  • Animals
  • Biomarkers (metabolism)
  • Cell Proliferation
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental
  • Granulation Tissue (metabolism)
  • Immunohistochemistry
  • Ki-67 Antigen (metabolism)
  • Kinetics
  • Mice
  • Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy (instrumentation)
  • Neovascularization, Physiologic
  • Occlusive Dressings
  • Time Factors
  • Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 (metabolism)
  • Wound Healing (physiology)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: