HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Prophylactic amiodarone versus lidocaine for prevention of reperfusion ventricular fibrillation after release of aortic cross-clamp.

AbstractBACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:
Ventricular fibrillation is common after aortic cross-clamp release in patients undergoing open-heart surgeries. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of the prophylactic administration of 150 mg amiodarone by way of the pump 2 min before release of aortic cross-clamp in preventing ventricular fibrillation.
METHODS:
The present study is a prospective, randomized, controlled and blinded study performed at a teaching university hospital where 120 patients undergoing coronary bypass graft surgery were randomly assigned to three groups. Each group received either 150 mg of amiodarone or 100 mg lidocaine or isotonic saline by way of pump 2 min before release of the aortic cross-clamp. The frequency of occurrence of ventricular fibrillation and the subsequent required defibrillation counter shocks were determined in all groups.
RESULTS:
The frequency of occurrence of ventricular fibrillation was significantly higher in both the amiodarone (48%) and the control group (45%) as compared with the lidocaine group (20%) with no statistically significant difference between the amiodarone and the control groups. Furthermore, when ventricular fibrillation occurred, the percentage of patients requiring defibrillation counter shocks was significantly higher in both the amiodarone (58%) and control (61%) groups as compared with the lidocaine group (13%) with no difference between the amiodarone and the control groups, despite a significant decrease in the defibrillation counter shocks energy requirements in the amiodarone group.
CONCLUSION:
The present study showed no difference between amiodarone (150 mg) and placebo in preventing ventricular fibrillation after release of aortic cross-clamp. In addition, the use of lidocaine was able to reduce the incidence of ventricular fibrillation as compared with both amiodarone and placebo.
AuthorsChakib M Ayoub, Pierre M Sfeir, Pierre Bou-Khalil, Mireille Azar, Ala' S Haddadin, Diala Harfouch, Viviane G Nasr, Mohamad F El-Khatib
JournalEuropean journal of anaesthesiology (Eur J Anaesthesiol) Vol. 26 Issue 12 Pg. 1056-60 (Dec 2009) ISSN: 1365-2346 [Electronic] England
PMID19809326 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
Chemical References
  • Anti-Arrhythmia Agents
  • Lidocaine
  • Amiodarone
Topics
  • Aged
  • Amiodarone (therapeutic use)
  • Anti-Arrhythmia Agents (therapeutic use)
  • Clinical Protocols
  • Coronary Artery Bypass
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lidocaine (therapeutic use)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Myocardial Reperfusion (adverse effects)
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Ventricular Fibrillation (etiology, prevention & control)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: