HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Cost-effectiveness of pemetrexed plus cisplatin as first-line therapy for advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer.

AbstractINTRODUCTION:
To estimate the cost-effectiveness of first-line cisplatin/pemetrexed (Cis/Pem) compared with cisplatin/gemcitabine (Cis/Gem), carboplatin/paclitaxel (Carb/Pac), and carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab (Carb/Pac/Bev) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly in those with nonsquamous cell histology (i.e., adenocarcinoma, large cell carcinoma, or histology not otherwise specified).
METHODS:
A semi-Markov model was developed to compare the 2-year impact of Cis/Pem to three other first-line regimens from the U.S. payer perspective. Data from the randomized controlled clinical trial of Cis/Pem versus Cis/Gem and a mixed treatment comparison model (no head-to-head data were available for the Cis/Pem to Carb/Pac or Carb/Pac/Bev comparisons) provided clinical inputs. Medicare reimbursement rates were used to determine drug costs. A retrospective claims database analysis was used to obtain estimates of other direct NSCLC-related costs.
RESULTS:
In all patients with advanced NSCLC regardless of histologic subtype, using Cis/Pem as first-line chemotherapy led to an incremental cost per life-year gained (LYG) of $104,577 for Cis/Pem to Cis/Gem and $231,291 for Cis/Pem to Carb/Pac. In the prespecified subset of patients with nonsquamous cell histology, the incremental cost per LYG was $83,537 for Cis/Pem to Cis/Gem and $178,613 for Cis/Pem to Carb/Pac. The incremental cost per LYG for Carb/Pac/Bev to Cis/Pem was more than $300,000.
CONCLUSIONS:
Compared with commonly used and reimbursed regimens for first-line chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC, Cis/Pem may be considered cost-effective, particularly in patients with nonsquamous cell histology. This analysis emphasizes the importance of histology in identifying the appropriate patient for Cis/Pem first-line chemotherapy.
AuthorsRobert Klein, Catherine Muehlenbein, Astra M Liepa, Steve Babineaux, Ron Wielage, Lee Schwartzberg
JournalJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (J Thorac Oncol) Vol. 4 Issue 11 Pg. 1404-14 (Nov 2009) ISSN: 1556-1380 [Electronic] United States
PMID19786904 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
Chemical References
  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Drosophila Proteins
  • Glutamates
  • Pemetrexed
  • Guanine
  • Thymidylate Synthase
  • Endopeptidases
  • RN-tre protein, Drosophila
  • Cisplatin
Topics
  • Antineoplastic Agents (economics, therapeutic use)
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung (drug therapy, economics, pathology)
  • Cisplatin (economics, therapeutic use)
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Drosophila Proteins
  • Drug Costs
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Endopeptidases
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Glutamates (economics, therapeutic use)
  • Guanine (analogs & derivatives, economics, therapeutic use)
  • Humans
  • Lung Neoplasms (drug therapy, economics, pathology)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Models, Economic
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Pemetrexed
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Thymidylate Synthase (antagonists & inhibitors)
  • United States

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: