HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Comparison of safety and efficacy of bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in percutaneous peripheral intervention: a single-center experience.

AbstractOBJECTIVES:
The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin versus low-dose unfractionated heparin (UFH) in percutaneous peripheral intervention (PPI).
BACKGROUND:
Anticoagulation strategies used in PPI are based primarily on studies of percutaneous coronary intervention where higher doses of heparin are used usually in combination with a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor. There are no studies comparing bivalirudin alone versus low-dose heparin in PPI.
METHODS:
Consecutive patients who underwent PPI at our institution were treated with either bivalirudin or low-dose UFH. Patients were assessed prospectively during index hospital stay for procedural success and bleeding complications. Of 236 patients, 111 were dosed with UFH at 50 U/kg (goal activated clotting time of 180 to 240 s), and 125 were dosed with bivalirudin at 0.75-mg/kg/h bolus followed by a 1.75-mg/kg infusion. Procedural success was defined as <20% post-procedure residual stenosis with no flow-limiting dissections or intravascular thrombus formation and major bleeding as intracranial or retroperitoneal hemorrhage or a fall in hemoglobin >or=5 g/dl. Anticoagulation cost analysis was conducted.
RESULTS:
Procedural success and major bleeding rates were similar with bivalirudin versus heparin (98% vs. 99% and 2.4% vs. 0.9%, respectively). There were no differences in minor bleeding, time to ambulation, and length of hospital stay. The hospital cost for bivalirudin was $547 and <$1.22 for heparin (10,000 U). Two activated clotting time levels cost $4.00.
CONCLUSIONS:
Low-dose UFH is as effective and safe as bivalirudin when used as an anticoagulation strategy in patients undergoing PPI, and low-dose UFH is less costly than bivalirudin. Larger randomized studies are required to further evaluate these findings.
AuthorsImran R Sheikh, S Hinan Ahmed, Naoyo Mori, Anjan Gupta, Mark Mewissen, Suhail Allaqaband, Tanvir Bajwa
JournalJACC. Cardiovascular interventions (JACC Cardiovasc Interv) Vol. 2 Issue 9 Pg. 871-6 (Sep 2009) ISSN: 1876-7605 [Electronic] United States
PMID19778776 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article)
Chemical References
  • Anticoagulants
  • Hirudins
  • Peptide Fragments
  • Recombinant Proteins
  • Heparin
  • bivalirudin
Topics
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Angioplasty (adverse effects, economics, instrumentation)
  • Anticoagulants (adverse effects, economics, therapeutic use)
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Drug Costs
  • Female
  • Hemorrhage (chemically induced)
  • Heparin (adverse effects, economics, therapeutic use)
  • Hirudins (adverse effects, economics)
  • Hospital Costs
  • Humans
  • Length of Stay
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Peptide Fragments (adverse effects, economics, therapeutic use)
  • Peripheral Vascular Diseases (drug therapy, economics, therapy)
  • Prospective Studies
  • Recombinant Proteins (adverse effects, economics, therapeutic use)
  • Stents
  • Thrombosis (etiology, prevention & control)
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Walking

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: