Abstract | PURPOSE: METHODS: In group 1, the area under the tourniquet was anesthetized circumferentially using a cream composed of 5% lidocaine and 5% prilocaine (Emla Astra). In group 2, the area under the tourniquet was anesthetized with a ring-type infiltration of the skin and subcutaneus tissues using 50% diluted Citanest solution using 22 G x 3 1/2'' size spinal needle (Sujia) with three injections. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the means of the two groups with respect to both tests (p value = 0.18 [t-test], p = 0.951 [Mann-Whitney test]). Tourniquet related anesthesia technique discomfort was higher in group 2 (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The tourniquet placed at the distal forearm is an effective, safe, and useful technique for hand surgery. Anesthesia using Emla cream is equally effective and less disturbing than using the injection technique (subcutaneus ring anesthesia).
|
Authors | Sermet Inal, Mehmet Er, Mehmet Ozsoy, Ali Cavusoglu, Veysel Dincel, Abdurrahman Sakaogullari |
Journal | The Iowa orthopaedic journal
(Iowa Orthop J)
Vol. 29
Pg. 55-9
( 2009)
ISSN: 1555-1377 [Electronic] United States |
PMID | 19742086
(Publication Type: Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
|
Chemical References |
- Anesthetics, Local
- Ointments
- Prilocaine
- Lidocaine
|
Topics |
- Administration, Topical
- Adolescent
- Adult
- Anesthesia
(methods)
- Anesthetics, Local
(administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
- Female
- Forearm
- Hand
(surgery)
- Humans
- Injections, Subcutaneous
- Lidocaine
(administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Ointments
- Pain Measurement
- Pain, Postoperative
(prevention & control)
- Prilocaine
(administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
- Prospective Studies
- Tourniquets
(adverse effects)
- Treatment Outcome
- Young Adult
|