HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Vertebroplasty is commonly used to treat painful, osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
METHODS:
In this multicenter trial, we randomly assigned 131 patients who had one to three painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures to undergo either vertebroplasty or a simulated procedure without cement (control group). The primary outcomes were scores on the modified Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) (on a scale of 0 to 23, with higher scores indicating greater disability) and patients' ratings of average pain intensity during the preceding 24 hours at 1 month (on a scale of 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more severe pain). Patients were allowed to cross over to the other study group after 1 month.
RESULTS:
All patients underwent the assigned intervention (68 vertebroplasties and 63 simulated procedures). The baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. At 1 month, there was no significant difference between the vertebroplasty group and the control group in either the RDQ score (difference, 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.3 to 2.8; P=0.49) or the pain rating (difference, 0.7; 95% CI, -0.3 to 1.7; P=0.19). Both groups had immediate improvement in disability and pain scores after the intervention. Although the two groups did not differ significantly on any secondary outcome measure at 1 month, there was a trend toward a higher rate of clinically meaningful improvement in pain (a 30% decrease from baseline) in the vertebroplasty group (64% vs. 48%, P=0.06). At 3 months, there was a higher crossover rate in the control group than in the vertebroplasty group (51% vs. 13%, P<0.001) [corrected]. There was one serious adverse event in each group.
CONCLUSIONS:
Improvements in pain and pain-related disability associated with osteoporotic compression fractures in patients treated with vertebroplasty were similar to the improvements in a control group. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00068822.)
AuthorsDavid F Kallmes, Bryan A Comstock, Patrick J Heagerty, Judith A Turner, David J Wilson, Terry H Diamond, Richard Edwards, Leigh A Gray, Lydia Stout, Sara Owen, William Hollingworth, Basavaraj Ghdoke, Deborah J Annesley-Williams, Stuart H Ralston, Jeffrey G Jarvik
JournalThe New England journal of medicine (N Engl J Med) Vol. 361 Issue 6 Pg. 569-79 (Aug 06 2009) ISSN: 1533-4406 [Electronic] United States
PMID19657122 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural)
Copyright2009 Massachusetts Medical Society
Chemical References
  • Bone Cements
  • Polymethacrylic Acids
  • polymethacrylic acid
Topics
  • Aged
  • Back Pain (etiology, therapy)
  • Bone Cements
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Disability Evaluation
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Fractures, Compression (complications, therapy)
  • Humans
  • Injections, Spinal
  • Male
  • Osteoporosis (complications)
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care
  • Pain Measurement
  • Placebo Effect
  • Polymethacrylic Acids
  • Spinal Fractures (etiology, therapy)
  • Treatment Failure
  • Vertebroplasty (adverse effects, methods)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: