HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Placebo-controlled phase III trial of patient-specific immunotherapy with mitumprotimut-T and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor after rituximab in patients with follicular lymphoma.

AbstractPURPOSE:
To evaluate patient-specific immunotherapy with mitumprotimut-T (idiotype keyhole limpet hemocyanin [Id-KLH]) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in CD20(+) follicular lymphoma.
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
Patients with treatment-naive or relapsed/refractory disease achieving a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) with four weekly rituximab infusions were randomly assigned to mitumprotimut-T/GM-CSF or placebo/GM-CSF, with doses given monthly for six doses, every 2 months for six doses, and then every 3 months until disease progression (PD). Randomization was stratified by prior therapy (treatment-naive or relapsed/refractory) and response to rituximab (CR/PR or SD). The primary end point was time to progression (TTP) from randomization.
RESULTS:
A total of 349 patients were randomly assigned; median age was 54 years, 79% were treatment naive, and 86% had stage III/IV disease. Median TTP was 9.0 months for mitumprotimut-T/GM-CSF and 12.6 months for placebo/GM-CSF (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.384; P = .019). TTP was comparable between the two arms in treatment-naive patients (HR = 1.196; P = .258) and shorter with mitumprotimut-T/GM-CSF in relapsed/refractory disease (HR = 2.265; P = .004). After adjusting for Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) scores, the difference in TTP between the two arms was no longer significant. Overall objective response rate, rate of response improvement, and duration of response were comparable between the two arms. Toxicity was similar in the two arms; 76% of adverse events were mild or moderate, and 94% of patients had injection site reactions.
CONCLUSION:
TTP was shorter with mitumprotimut-T/GM-CSF compared with placebo/GM-CSF. This difference was possibly due to the imbalance in FLIPI scores.
AuthorsArnold Freedman, Sattva S Neelapu, Craig Nichols, Michael J Robertson, Benjamin Djulbegovic, Jane N Winter, John F Bender, Daniel P Gold, Richard G Ghalie, Morgan E Stewart, Vanessa Esquibel, Paul Hamlin
JournalJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (J Clin Oncol) Vol. 27 Issue 18 Pg. 3036-43 (Jun 20 2009) ISSN: 1527-7755 [Electronic] United States
PMID19414675 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Phase III, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived
  • Antigens, CD20
  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Cancer Vaccines
  • Immunoglobulin Idiotypes
  • Rituximab
  • Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor
  • Hemocyanins
  • keyhole-limpet hemocyanin
Topics
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal (administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived
  • Antigens, CD20 (immunology)
  • Antineoplastic Agents (administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
  • Cancer Vaccines (administration & dosage)
  • Disease Progression
  • Female
  • Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor (administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
  • Hemocyanins (immunology)
  • Humans
  • Immunoglobulin Idiotypes (immunology)
  • Immunotherapy (methods)
  • Lymphoma, Follicular (therapy)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Rituximab

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: