HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

A clinical and radiological evaluation of DFDBA with amniotic membrane versus bovine derived xenograft with amniotic membrane in human periodontal grade II furcation defects.

Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to clinically and radiographically evaluate and compare the efficacy of demineralized freeze dried bone allograft (DFDBA) and bovine derived xenogenic bone graft (BDX) [Bio-Oss] with amniotic membrane (AM) as guided tissue regeneration (GTR) in the treatment of human periodontal Grade II buccal furcation defects. Ten patients suffering from chronic periodontitis, displaying bilateral Grade II buccal furcation defect, were randomly treated using DFDBA with AM (Experimental site A) or using bovine derived xenograft (BDX) with AM (Experimental site B). The clinical and radiographic parameters were recorded at baseline, 6 and 9 months. Healing was uneventful in all patients except one site which was treated with BDX + AM. At 9 months after therapy, soft tissue measurements for the DFDBA + AM group showed pocket depth (PD) reduction of 4.7 mm +/- 0.58, and relative attachment level gain of 4.8 mm + 0.32, while the BDX + AM group showed a PD reduction of 4.4 mm +/- 0.27, and AL gain of 5.1 mm +/- 0.09. Osseous measurements showed bone fill of 2.1 mm +/- 0.36 for the DFDBA + AM group and 2.43 mm +/- 0.38 for the BDX + AM group. Percentage gain in bone was 76.3% for the DFDBA + AM group and 79.6% for the BDX + AM group. Statistical analysis revealed there was no statistical difference between the two materials in all measurements. Within the limits of the present study, it can be concluded that: (1) at 9 months after surgery both therapies resulted in significant PD reductions and CAL gains and (2) significant improvement was seen in bone fill and percentage gain with both the material, however, there was no significant difference between both.
AuthorsShaila V Kothiwale, P Anuroopa, A L Gajiwala
JournalCell and tissue banking (Cell Tissue Bank) Vol. 10 Issue 4 Pg. 317-26 (Nov 2009) ISSN: 1573-6814 [Electronic] Netherlands
PMID19277899 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
Chemical References
  • Bio-Oss
  • Bone Substitutes
  • Minerals
Topics
  • Adult
  • Amnion (transplantation)
  • Animals
  • Bone Substitutes (therapeutic use)
  • Bone Transplantation (methods)
  • Cattle
  • Female
  • Furcation Defects (diagnosis, surgery)
  • Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal (methods)
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Minerals (therapeutic use)
  • Radiology
  • Transplantation, Heterologous
  • Transplantation, Homologous

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: