HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

TSH-based protocol, tablet instability, and absorption effects on L-T4 bioequivalence.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
FDA Guidance for pharmacokinetic (PK) testing of levothyroxine (L-T(4)) for interbrand bioequivalence has evolved recently. Concerns remain about efficacy and safety of the current protocol, based on PK analysis following supraphysiological L-T(4) dosing in euthyroid volunteers, and recent recalls due to intrabrand manufacturing problems also suggest need for further refinement. We examine these interrelated issues quantitatively, using simulated what-if scenarios testing efficacy of a TSH-based protocol and tablet stability and absorption, to enhance precision of L-T(4) bioequivalence methods.
METHODS:
We use an updated simulation model of human thyroid hormone regulation quantified and validated from data that span a wide range of normal and abnormal thyroid system function. Bioequivalence: We explored a TSH-based protocol, using normal replacement dosing in simulated thyroidectomized patients, switching brands after 8 weeks of full replacement dosing. We simulated effects of tablet potency differences and intestinal absorption differences on predicted plasma TSH, T(4), and triiodothyronine (T(3)) dynamics. Stability: We simulated effects of potency decay and lot-by-lot differences in realistic scenarios, using actual tablet potency data spanning 2 years, comparing the recently reduced 95-105% FDA-approved potency range with the original 90-110% range.
RESULTS:
A simulated decrease as small as 10-15% in L-T(4) or its absorption generated TSH concentrations outside the bioequivalence target range (0.5-2.5 mU/L TSH), whereas T(3) and T(4) plasma levels were maintained normal. For a 25% reduction, steady-state TSH changed 300% (from 1.5 to 6 mU/L) compared with <25% for both T(4) and T(3) (both within their reference ranges). Stability: TSH, T(4), and T(3) remained within normal ranges for most potency decay scenarios, but tablets of the same dose strength and brand were not bioequivalent between lots and between fresh and near-expired tablets.
CONCLUSIONS:
A pharmacodynamic TSH-measurement bioequivalence protocol, using normal L-T(4) replacement dosing in athyreotic volunteers, is likely to be more sensitive and safer than current FDA Guidance based on T(4) PK. The tightened 95-105% allowable potency range for L-T(4) tablets is a significant improvement, but otherwise acceptable potency differences (whether due to potency decay or lot-by-lot inconsistencies) may be problematic for some patients, for example, those undergoing high-dose L-T(4) therapy for cancer.
AuthorsMarisa Eisenberg, Joseph J Distefano
JournalThyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association (Thyroid) Vol. 19 Issue 2 Pg. 103-10 (Feb 2009) ISSN: 1557-9077 [Electronic] United States
PMID19191742 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Tablets
  • Triiodothyronine
  • Thyrotropin
  • Thyroxine
Topics
  • Computer Simulation
  • Drug Stability
  • Humans
  • Intestinal Absorption (physiology)
  • Tablets
  • Therapeutic Equivalency
  • Thyrotropin (blood)
  • Thyroxine (pharmacokinetics)
  • Triiodothyronine (blood)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: