HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Dexamethasone minimizes the risk of cranial nerve injury during CEA.

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
The incidence of cranial and cervical nerve injury during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) ranges from less than 7.6% to more than 50%. Lesions are mainly due to surgical maneuvers such as traction, compression, tissue electrocoagulation, clamping, and extensive dissections. The use of dexamethasone (DEX) and its beneficial effects in spinal cord injuries have already been described. We investigated whether DEX could also be beneficial to minimize the incidence of cranial and cervical nerve injury during CEA.
PURPOSE:
To evaluate whether dexamethasone is able to reduce the incidence of cranial nerve injuries.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
From March 1999 through April 2006, 1126 patients undergoing CEA because of high-grade carotid stenosis were enrolled and randomized by predetermined randomization tables into two groups. The first group, "A", included 586 patients that all received an intravenous administration of dexamethasone following a therapeutic scheme. The second group, "B", included 540 control subjects that received the standard pre- and postoperative therapy. All patients were submitted to a deep cervical plexus block, eversion carotid endarterectomy, and selective shunting. Three days after the operation, an independent neurologist and otorhinolaryngologist evaluated the presence of cranial nerve deficits. All patients (group A and group B) showing nerve injuries continued the treatment (8 mg of dexamethasone once in the morning) for 7 days and were re-evaluated after 2 weeks, 30 days, and every 3 months for 1 year. Recovery time took from 2 weeks to 12 months, with a mean time of 3.6 months. The chi(2) test was used to compare the two groups and to check for statistical significance.
RESULTS:
The incidence of cranial nerve dysfunction was higher in group B and the statistical analysis showed a significant effect of dexamethasone in preventing the neurological damage (P = .0081). The incidence of temporary lesions was lower in group A and the chi(2) test yielded a P value of .006. No statistically significant differences were found when comparing the effect of dexamethasone in men and women. In addition, dexamethasone had no statistically significant effect on the incidence of permanent cranial nerve injuries. Finally, no adverse effect related to the administration of dexamethasone was observed.
CONCLUSION:
Perioperative administration of dexamethasone is effective in minimizing the incidence of temporary cranial nerve injuries during CEA.
AuthorsGuido Regina, Domenico Angiletta, Giovanni Impedovo, Giovanni De Robertis, Marialuisa Fiorella, Maria Rosaria Carratu'
JournalJournal of vascular surgery (J Vasc Surg) Vol. 49 Issue 1 Pg. 99-102; discussion 103 (Jan 2009) ISSN: 1097-6809 [Electronic] United States
PMID19028044 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
Chemical References
  • Neuroprotective Agents
  • Dexamethasone
Topics
  • Aged
  • Carotid Stenosis (surgery)
  • Cranial Nerve Injuries (epidemiology, etiology, prevention & control)
  • Dexamethasone (administration & dosage, adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Endarterectomy, Carotid (adverse effects)
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Injections, Intravenous
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neuroprotective Agents (administration & dosage, adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Preoperative Care
  • Prospective Studies
  • Risk Assessment
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: