HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial.

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
To compare effectiveness and costs of gauze-based vs occlusive, moist-environment dressing principles.
DESIGN:
Randomized clinical trial.
SETTING:
Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
PATIENTS:
Two hundred eighty-five hospitalized surgical patients with open wounds.
INTERVENTION:
Patients received occlusive (ie, foams, alginates, hydrogels, hydrocolloids, hydrofibers, or films) or gauze-based dressings until their wounds were completely healed.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:
Primary end points were complete wound healing, pain during dressing changes, and costs. Secondary end point was length of hospital stay.
RESULTS:
Time to complete wound healing did not differ significantly between occlusive (median, 66 days; interquartile range [IQR], 29-133 days) and gauze-based dressing groups (median, 45 days; IQR, 26-106 days; log-rank P = .31). Postoperative wounds (62% of the wounds included) healed significantly (P = .02) quicker using gauze dressings (median, 45 days; IQR, 22-93 days vs median, 72 days; IQR, 36-132 days). Median pain scores were low and similar in the occlusive (0.90; IQR, 0.29-2.34) and the gauze (0.64; IQR, 0.22-1.95) groups (P = .32). Daily costs of occlusive materials were significantly higher (occlusive, euro6.34 [US $9.95] vs gauze, euro1.85 [US $2.90]; P < .001), but nursing time costs per day were significantly higher when gauze was used (occlusive, euro1.28 [US $2.01] vs gauze, euro2.41 [US $3.78]; P < .001). Total cost for local wound care per patient per day during hospitalization was euro7.48 (US $11.74) in the occlusive group and euro3.98 (US $6.25) in the gauze-based group (P = .002).
CONCLUSIONS:
The occlusive, moist-environment dressing principle in the clinical surgical setting does not lead to quicker wound healing or less pain than gauze dressings. The lower costs of less frequent dressing changes do not balance the higher costs of occlusive materials. Trial Registration trialregister.nl Identifier: 56264738.
AuthorsDirk T Ubbink, Hester Vermeulen, Astrid Goossens, Raoul B Kelner, Sanne M Schreuder, Maarten J Lubbers
JournalArchives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960) (Arch Surg) Vol. 143 Issue 10 Pg. 950-5 (Oct 2008) ISSN: 1538-3644 [Electronic] United States
PMID18936373 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Topics
  • Academic Medical Centers
  • Adult
  • Bandages (economics, statistics & numerical data)
  • Bandages, Hydrocolloid (economics, statistics & numerical data)
  • Cost Savings
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Hospital Costs
  • Humans
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Male
  • Netherlands
  • Occlusive Dressings (economics, statistics & numerical data)
  • Pain Measurement
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Probability
  • Reference Values
  • Risk Assessment
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Statistics, Nonparametric
  • Surgical Procedures, Operative (methods, mortality)
  • Surgical Wound Infection (prevention & control, therapy)
  • Wound Healing (physiology)
  • Wounds and Injuries (therapy)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: