Abstract |
A child admitted for abdominal pain was evaluated with an abdominal computed tomography scan. Calcification was noted at the ureterovesical junction. The child had undergone successful bilateral Deflux injection 3 years earlier. No hydronephrosis was noted and an intravenous pyelogram was normal. Ureteroscopy revealed no intraluminal stones, and a follow-up scan showed the lesion to be still present and unchanged. This case illustrates that calcifications within a Deflux bleb can be mistaken for a ureteral calculus, and the entire clinical picture should be kept in mind when evaluating a patient with abdominal pain. Due to the widespread use of Deflux to treat vesicoureteral reflux, this phenomenon may be seen more frequently as this population ages.
|
Authors | H Norman Noe |
Journal | Journal of pediatric urology
(J Pediatr Urol)
Vol. 4
Issue 1
Pg. 88-9
(Feb 2008)
ISSN: 1873-4898 [Electronic] England |
PMID | 18631899
(Publication Type: Case Reports, Journal Article)
|
Chemical References |
- Dextrans
- deflux
- Hyaluronic Acid
|
Topics |
- Abdominal Pain
(etiology)
- Blister
(pathology)
- Calcinosis
- Child
- Dextrans
- Female
- Humans
- Hyaluronic Acid
- Prostheses and Implants
(adverse effects)
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed
- Ureteral Calculi
(diagnosis)
- Vesico-Ureteral Reflux
(surgery)
|