Abstract | BACKGROUND: METHODS: In a cohort of 1132 men a nomogram was developed to predict the probability of IPCa. Predictors consisted of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), clinical stage, biopsy Gleason sum, core cancer length and percentage of positive biopsy cores (percent positive cores). IPCa was defined as organ-confined PCa (OC) with tumor volume (TV) <0.5 cc and without Gleason 4 or 5 patterns. Finally, an external validation of the most accurate IPCa nomogram was performed in the same group. RESULTS:
IPCa was pathologically confirmed in 65 (5.7%) men. The 200 bootstrap-corrected predictive accuracy of the new nomogram was 90% versus 81% for the older nomogram. However, in cutoff-based analyses of patients who were qualified by our and the older nomograms as high probability for IPCa, respectively 63% and 45% harbored aggressive PCa variants at radical prostatectomy (Gleason score 7-10, ECE, SVI, and/or LNI). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a high accuracy, currently available models for prediction of IPCa are incorrect in 10% to 20% of predictions. The rate of misclassification is even further inflated when specific cutoffs are used. As a consequence, extreme caution is advised when statistical tools are used to assign the diagnosis of IPCa.
|
Authors | Felix K-H Chun, Alexander Haese, Sascha A Ahyai, Jochen Walz, Nazareno Suardi, Umberto Capitanio, Markus Graefen, Andreas Erbersdobler, Hartwig Huland, Pierre I Karakiewicz |
Journal | Cancer
(Cancer)
Vol. 113
Issue 4
Pg. 701-9
(Aug 15 2008)
ISSN: 0008-543X [Print] United States |
PMID | 18553365
(Publication Type: Comparative Study, Evaluation Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
|
Copyright | 2008 American Cancer Society |
Chemical References |
- Prostate-Specific Antigen
|
Topics |
- Biopsy
- Humans
- Male
- Nomograms
- Predictive Value of Tests
- Prostate-Specific Antigen
- Prostatectomy
- Prostatic Neoplasms
(diagnosis, surgery)
- Risk Assessment
- Tumor Burden
|