Abstract | BACKGROUND: PATIENTS AND METHODS: RESULTS: There was no difference in survival between both arms with respective median, 2 and 5 years of 15.5 months, 35% and 18% in arm A and 17.0 months, 38% and 21% in arm B (P = 0.50). Performance status and T status were identified as independent prognostic factors for survival. In terms of local control rate, there was a statistical trend in favour of arm A with 2% only local relapse versus 10% in arm B. Daily cisplatin radiosensitisation was associated with more oesophagitis and thrombopenia but less nephrotoxicity. CONCLUSION: Induction chemoradiotherapy resulted in both arms in good long-term survival, comparable to the best reported results and without improvement by daily cisplatin administration.
|
Authors | J P Sculier, J J Lafitte, A Efremidis, M C Florin, J Lecomte, M C Berchier, M Richez, T Berghmans, A Scherpereel, A P Meert, G Koumakis, N Leclercq, M Paesmans, P Van Houtte, European Lung Cancer Working Party (ELCWP) |
Journal | Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology
(Ann Oncol)
Vol. 19
Issue 10
Pg. 1691-7
(Oct 2008)
ISSN: 1569-8041 [Electronic] England |
PMID | 18504252
(Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Phase III, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial)
|
Chemical References |
- Radiation-Sensitizing Agents
- Etoposide
- Cisplatin
|
Topics |
- Adult
- Aged
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
(administration & dosage, adverse effects)
- Carcinoma, Small Cell
(drug therapy, radiotherapy)
- Cisplatin
(administration & dosage, adverse effects)
- Combined Modality Therapy
- Disease-Free Survival
- Drug Administration Schedule
- Etoposide
(administration & dosage, adverse effects)
- Female
- Humans
- Lung Neoplasms
(drug therapy, radiotherapy)
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Radiation-Sensitizing Agents
(administration & dosage, adverse effects)
|