HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Broad-spectrum sunscreens provide better protection from solar ultraviolet-simulated radiation and natural sunlight-induced immunosuppression in human beings.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
It is well established that ultraviolet (UV) radiation induces immunomodulatory effects that may be involved in skin cancer. Recent studies have shown that UVA (320-400 nm) and UVB (290-320 nm) radiation are immunosuppressive. As a result, sunscreens, which mainly absorb UVB, may be less effective in preventing UV radiation-induced immunosuppression than broad-spectrum products.
OBJECTIVE:
We sought to study the effects of UVA exposure on human delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) response and compare the efficacy of sunscreens having different levels of sun-protection factor (SPF) and UVA protection against both solar-simulated radiation and outdoor real-life sunlight exposure conditions.
METHODS:
DTH was assessed using a kit which includes 7 recall antigens that most of the participants encountered during childhood immunization. Evaluation of DTH test response was made 48 hours after test application before and after UV exposure with or without sunscreens.
RESULTS:
In unprotected participants, the response to DTH tests was significantly reduced irrespective of UV types of exposure (full-spectrum UVA, long UVA, solar-simulated radiation). A UVB sunscreen failed to protect from solar-simulated radiation-induced immunosuppression. In contrast, a broad-spectrum sunscreen with the same SPF but providing a high protection in the UVA range significantly reduced local UV-induced immunosuppression and prevented the distant effects. In the outdoor study, as compared with DTH responses obtained before sun exposure, no alteration of immune response was detected when the skin was protected by a broad-spectrum sunscreen having a high protection level in the UVA (SPF 25, UVA protection factor 14). Conversely a broad-spectrum sunscreen with lower protection against UVA (SPF 25, UVA protection factor 6) failed to prevent UV-impaired response.
LIMITATIONS:
These results have been obtained after repeated exposure. Additional experiments obtained under acute exposure are in progress.
CONCLUSION:
These findings clearly demonstrated the role of UVA in the induction of photoimmunosuppression together with the need for sunscreen products providing efficient photoprotection throughout the entire UV spectrum.
AuthorsDominique D Moyal, Anny M Fourtanier
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology (J Am Acad Dermatol) Vol. 58 Issue 5 Suppl 2 Pg. S149-54 (May 2008) ISSN: 1097-6787 [Electronic] United States
PMID18410801 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review)
Chemical References
  • Sunscreening Agents
Topics
  • Absorption
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hypersensitivity, Delayed (immunology, prevention & control)
  • Immune Tolerance (immunology)
  • Male
  • Radiation Dosage
  • Skin (radiation effects)
  • Skin Neoplasms (prevention & control)
  • Sunlight (adverse effects)
  • Sunscreening Agents (pharmacology, therapeutic use)
  • Ultraviolet Rays (adverse effects)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: