HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Comparing the effectiveness of polyethylene covers (Gladwrap) with lanolin (Duratears) eye ointment to prevent corneal abrasions in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled study.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
In unconscious ventilated patients, various eye protective measures have been used to prevent corneal abrasions. Two randomized controlled studies in Australia had compared the effectiveness of polyethylene films and eye instillations to prevent corneal abrasions but results were inconsistent. The local acceptance of polyethylene films as a standard eye protective measure is still limited.
OBJECTIVES:
Our study aims to compare the effectiveness of polyethylene covers (Gladwrap) with lanolin (Duratears) eye ointment in the prevention of corneal abrasions in critically ill patients.
DESIGN:
A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted between April 2004 and December 2005.
SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS:
One hundred and twenty ventilated patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) were randomly assigned to receive either polyethylene covers or lanolin eye ointment to prevent corneal abrasions.
METHODS:
All participants received a standard eye care regime together with the eye protective interventions. A fluorescein stain test was performed by the eye care team daily and then weekly to detect any corneal abrasions.
RESULTS:
Four participants were not included in the data analysis as they died soon after commencement of the study. A total of 116 patients were included in the final analysis. Of the seven patients (6.0%) that had a positive fluorescein test, four (6.8%) were in the polyethylene covers group (n=59) and three (5.3%) were in the lanolin eye ointment group (n=57). This was not statistically significant (p=0.519). One patient in the lanolin eye ointment group had an eye infection. Upon follow-up of those patients with positive fluorescein test results, two patients spontaneously converted to stain negative within 24h and two patients died before the ophthalmologist's assessment. The remaining three patients were diagnosed to have epithelial cell loss without corneal abrasions.
CONCLUSIONS:
With the implementation of a standardized eye care protocol, polyethylene cover is found to be equally effective in preventing corneal abrasions when compared with lanolin eye ointment. The additional benefit of polyethylene cover as a physical barrier to protect patients' eyes needed further evaluation.
AuthorsHang Mui So, Carmen Chun Heung Lee, Anne Kit Hung Leung, Jean Marie Jin Ai Lim, Christine Suk Ching Chan, Wing Wa Yan
JournalInternational journal of nursing studies (Int J Nurs Stud) Vol. 45 Issue 11 Pg. 1565-71 (Nov 2008) ISSN: 0020-7489 [Print] England
PMID18394624 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
Chemical References
  • Fluorescent Dyes
  • Ointments
  • Lanolin
  • Polyethylene
  • Fluorescein
Topics
  • Chi-Square Distribution
  • Clinical Nursing Research
  • Coma (complications, nursing)
  • Corneal Injuries
  • Critical Care (methods)
  • Critical Illness (nursing)
  • Eye Injuries (diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention & control)
  • Eye Protective Devices (standards)
  • Female
  • Fluorescein
  • Fluorescent Dyes
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Lanolin (therapeutic use)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Ointments
  • Polyethylene (therapeutic use)
  • Prospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Statistics, Nonparametric

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: