HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Efficacy and safety of intravenous infusion of doripenem versus imipenem in ventilator-associated pneumonia: a multicenter, randomized study.

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
Doripenem is an investigational carbapenem with broad-spectrum activity against gram-negative and gram-positive pathogens, including multidrug-resistant strains, commonly responsible for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). This large, phase III study compared doripenem with imipenem for the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia.
DESIGN:
Prospective, multicenter, parallel randomized, active-controlled, open-label study.
SETTING:
Intensive care units.
PATIENTS:
Adults (N = 531) who met clinical and radiologic criteria for ventilator-associated pneumonia.
INTERVENTIONS:
Patients were stratified by duration of mechanical ventilation (< 5 vs. > or = 5 days), severity of illness (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score < or = 15 vs. > 15), and geographic region and then randomly assigned to doripenem 500 mg every 8 hrs via a 4-hr intravenous infusion or imipenem 500 mg every 6 hrs or 1000 mg every 8 hrs via 30- or 60-min intravenous infusions, respectively, for 7-14 days.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:
The primary efficacy end points were the clinical cure rates in the clinical modified intent-to-treat (cMITT) and clinically evaluable populations. Doripenem was noninferior to imipenem (lower boundary of 95% confidence interval around the difference between treatments > or = -20%). Clinical cure rates were 68.3% (doripenem) and 64.2% (imipenem) in the clinically evaluable and 59.0% (doripenem) and 57.8% (imipenem) in the cMITT populations. In patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, clinical cure was 80.0% (doripenem) and 42.9% (imipenem) (p not significant); microbiological cure was 65.0% (doripenem) and 37.5% (imipenem). Only 18% (5 of 28) of P. aeruginosa isolates had minimum inhibitory concentration > or = 8 microg/mL at baseline or following therapy in the doripenem arm compared with 64% (16 of 25) in the imipenem treatment group (p = .001). Clinical cure rate was higher with doripenem than imipenem at higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores and older ages. Doripenem was generally well tolerated.
CONCLUSIONS:
In this large, phase III study of patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia, a 4-hr intravenous infusion of doripenem was clinically efficacious and therapeutically noninferior to imipenem.
AuthorsJean Chastre, Richard Wunderink, Philippe Prokocimer, Michael Lee, Koné Kaniga, Ian Friedland
JournalCritical care medicine (Crit Care Med) Vol. 36 Issue 4 Pg. 1089-96 (Apr 2008) ISSN: 1530-0293 [Electronic] United States
PMID18379232 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Carbapenems
  • Imipenem
  • Doripenem
Topics
  • APACHE
  • Aged
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents (administration & dosage, adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Carbapenems (administration & dosage, adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Doripenem
  • Female
  • Hospital Mortality
  • Humans
  • Imipenem (administration & dosage, adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Infusions, Intravenous
  • Male
  • Microbial Sensitivity Tests
  • Middle Aged
  • Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated (classification, drug therapy, microbiology)
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: