n-6 Fatty acids, like
n-3 fatty acids, play essential roles in many
biological functions. Because
n-6 fatty acids are the precursors of proinflammatory
eicosanoids, higher intakes have been suggested to be detrimental, and the ratio of n-6 to
n-3 fatty acids has been suggested by some to be particularly important. However, this hypothesis is based on minimal evidence, and in humans higher intakes of
n-6 fatty acids have not been associated with elevated levels of inflammatory markers.
n-6 Fatty acids have long been known to reduce serum total and
low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and increases in polyunsaturated fat intake, mostly as
n-6 fatty acids, were a cornerstone of dietary advice during the 1960s and 1970s. In the United States, for example, intake of
n-6 fatty acids doubled and
coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality fell by 50% over a period of several decades. In a series of relatively small, older randomized trials, in which intakes of polyunsaturated fat were increased (even up to 20% of calories), rates of CHD were generally reduced. In a more recent detailed examination of
fatty acid intake within the Nurses' Health Study, greater intake of
linoleic acid, up to about 8% of energy, has been strongly related to lower incidence of
myocardial infarction or CHD death. Because
n-3 fatty acids were also related inversely to risk of CHD, the ratio was unrelated to risk.
n-6 Fatty acids reduce
insulin resistance, probably by acting as a
ligand for
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors-gamma, and intakes have been inversely related to risk of
type 2 diabetes. Adequate intakes of both n-6 and
n-3 fatty acids are essential for good health and low rates of
cardiovascular disease and
type 2 diabetes, but the ratio of these
fatty acids is not useful. Reductions of
linoleic acid to "improve" this ratio would likely increase rates of
cardiovascular disease and diabetes.