HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

[Comparison of clinical efficacy of rokitamycin (RKM) and ofloxacin (OFLX) for the treatment of Campylobacter enteritis by a double-blind method. The Research Committee for the Effect of Rokitamycin, Research Group for Infectious Enteritis].

Abstract
The clinical efficacy, safety and usefulness of Rokitamycin (RKM), a new macrolide antibiotic, were compared with those of Ofloxacin (OFLX) for the treatment of Campylobacter enteritis by a double blind method. The daily dose level of RKM or OFLX was 600 mg. They were orally administered in three divided doses for 5 days. Of 223 cases studied, 106 cases were diagnosed as Campylobacter enteritis. Ninety cases (RKM group: 50, OFLX group: 40) except for 16 excluded or drop-out cases were analysed. There was no significant difference between the two groups in any background factors. The effectiveness and usefulness was evaluated in 88 cases (RKM group: 48, OFLX group: 40). The results obtained were as follows: 1. In a total of 82 strains of Campylobacter jejuni/coli (RKM group: 42, OFLX group: 40), the bacteriological efficacy rate of RKM (95.2%) was superior to that of OFLX (70.0%) with a significant difference (p = 0.006). 2. In 76 symptomatic patients (RKM group: 42, OFLX group: 34) on the day of the beginning of drug administration, the clinical efficacy rate was 97.6% in the RKM group and 85.3% in the OFLX group with no significant difference between the two groups. 3. In 88 evaluable patients, the global clinical efficacy rate of RKM (95.8%) was superior to that of OFLX (67.5%) with a significant difference (p = 0.001). 4. Side effect was observed in 1 (1.9%) of the 54 patients in the RKM group and none of the 44 patients in the OFLX group. Slightly abnormal laboratory findings were seen in 4 (10.8%) of the 37 patients treated with RKM and 3 (9.7%) of the 31 patients treated with OFLX, but there was no significant difference between the two groups. 5. In 88 evaluable patients, the clinical usefulness of RKM (91.7%) was superior to that of OFLX (67.5%) with a significant difference (p = 0.01). From these results, RKM is considered to be a very useful agent for the treatment of Campylobacter enteritis.
AuthorsM Obana, I Tomizawa, Y Takizawa, Y Nitta, H Sagara, T Seo, J Sato, T Tsunoda, S Ota, A Machii
JournalKansenshogaku zasshi. The Journal of the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases (Kansenshogaku Zasshi) Vol. 65 Issue 9 Pg. 1165-82 (Sep 1991) ISSN: 0387-5911 [Print] Japan
PMID1761896 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Controlled Clinical Trial, Journal Article)
Chemical References
  • Miocamycin
  • Ofloxacin
  • rokitamycin
Topics
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Campylobacter Infections (drug therapy)
  • Campylobacter coli
  • Campylobacter jejuni
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Enteritis (drug therapy)
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Miocamycin (analogs & derivatives, therapeutic use)
  • Ofloxacin (therapeutic use)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: