HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Injectable paromomycin for Visceral leishmaniasis in India.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Visceral leishmaniasis (kala-azar) affects large, rural, resource-poor populations in South Asia, Africa, and Brazil. Safe, effective, and affordable new therapies are needed. We conducted a randomized, controlled, phase 3 open-label study comparing paromomycin, an aminoglycoside, with amphotericin B, the present standard of care in Bihar, India.
METHODS:
In four treatment centers for visceral leishmaniasis, 667 patients between 5 and 55 years of age who were negative for the human immunodeficiency virus and had parasitologically confirmed visceral leishmaniasis were randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to receive paromomycin (502 patients) at a dose of 11 mg per kilogram of body weight intramuscularly daily for 21 days or amphotericin B (165 patients) at a dose of 1 mg per kilogram intravenously every other day for 30 days. Final cure was assessed 6 months after the end of treatment; safety assessments included daily clinical evaluations and weekly laboratory and audiometric evaluations. Noninferiority testing was used to compare 6-month cure rates, with a chosen margin of noninferiority of 10 percentage points.
RESULTS:
Paromomycin was shown to be noninferior to amphotericin B (final cure rate, 94.6% vs. 98.8%; difference, 4.2 percentage points; upper bound of the 97.5% confidence interval, 6.9; P<0.001). Mortality rates in the two groups were less than 1%. Adverse events, which were more common among patients receiving paromomycin than among those receiving amphotericin B (6% vs. 2%, P=0.02), included transient elevation of aspartate aminotransferase levels (>3 times the upper limit of the normal range); transient reversible ototoxicity (2% vs. 0, P=0.20); and injection-site pain (55% vs. 0, P<0.001); and in patients receiving amphotericin B, as compared with those receiving paromomycin, nephrotoxicity (4% vs. 0, P<0.001), fevers (57% vs. 3%), rigors (24% vs. 0, P<0.001), and vomiting (10% vs. <1%, P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS:
Paromomycin was shown to be noninferior to amphotericin B for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis in India. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00216346.)
AuthorsShyam Sundar, T K Jha, Chandreshwar P Thakur, Prabhat K Sinha, Sujit K Bhattacharya
JournalThe New England journal of medicine (N Engl J Med) Vol. 356 Issue 25 Pg. 2571-81 (Jun 21 2007) ISSN: 1533-4406 [Electronic] United States
PMID17582067 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Phase III, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
CopyrightCopyright 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Chemical References
  • Antiprotozoal Agents
  • Paromomycin
  • Amphotericin B
Topics
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Amphotericin B (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Animals
  • Antiprotozoal Agents (administration & dosage, adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Audiometry
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Disease Reservoirs
  • Female
  • Hearing Disorders (chemically induced, diagnosis)
  • Humans
  • India
  • Infusions, Intravenous
  • Injections, Intramuscular
  • Kidney Diseases (chemically induced)
  • Leishmania donovani
  • Leishmaniasis, Visceral (drug therapy, mortality)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Paromomycin (administration & dosage, adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Prospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: