HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Positive margins in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in 855 cases: a multi-institutional survey from the United States and Europe.

AbstractPURPOSE:
Open partial nephrectomy has emerged as the standard of care in the management of renal tumors smaller than 4 cm. While laparoscopic radical nephrectomy has been shown to be comparable to open radical nephrectomy with respect to long-term outcomes, important questions remain unanswered regarding the oncological efficacy of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. We examined the practice patterns and pathological outcomes following laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
A survey was sent to academic medical centers in the United States and in Europe performing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. The total number of laparoscopic partial nephrectomies, positive margins, indications for intraoperative frozen biopsy as well as tumor size and position were queried.
RESULTS:
Surveys suitable for analysis were received from 17 centers with a total of 855 laparoscopic partial nephrectomy cases. Mean tumor size was 2.7 cm (+/-0.6). There were 21 cases with positive margins on final pathology, giving an overall positive margin rate of 2.4%. Intraoperative frozen sections were performed selectively at 10 centers based on clinical suspicion of positive margins on excised tumor. Random biopsies were routinely performed on the resection bed at 5 centers. Frozen sections were never performed at 2 centers. Of the 21 cases with positive margins 14 underwent immediate radical nephrectomy based on the frozen section and 7 were followed expectantly.
CONCLUSIONS:
Early experience with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in this multicenter study demonstrates oncological efficacy comparable to that of open partial nephrectomy with respect to the incidence of positive margins. The practice of intraoperative frozen sections varied among centers and is not definitive in guiding the optimal surgical treatment.
AuthorsA Breda, S V Stepanian, J Liao, J S Lam, G Guazzoni, M Stifelman, K Perry, A Celia, G Breda, P Fornara, S Jackman, A Rosales, J Palou, M Grasso, V Pansadoro, V Disanto, F Porpiglia, C Milani, C Abbou, R Gaston, G Janetschek, N A Soomro, J de la Rosette, M P Laguna, P G Schulam
JournalThe Journal of urology (J Urol) Vol. 178 Issue 1 Pg. 47-50; discussion 50 (Jul 2007) ISSN: 0022-5347 [Print] United States
PMID17574057 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Multicenter Study)
Topics
  • Carcinoma, Renal Cell (pathology, surgery)
  • Europe
  • Health Surveys
  • Humans
  • Intraoperative Period
  • Kidney Neoplasms (pathology, surgery)
  • Laparoscopy
  • Nephrectomy
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United States

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: