Abstract |
A case of deep frostbite occurred in an 8.5-year-old child. The lesion was due to the improper use of a toilet air freshener and was severe enough to require a skin graft. The propellants contained in the spray were propane and butane. We measured the temperature of this aerosol during spraying (-40 degrees) in comparison with an ethyl chloride spray (-3 degrees) widely used for local skin anesthesia. This difference is mainly due to the much lower evaporation temperature of propane (-42.2 degrees) and butane (-0.6 degrees) compared with ethyl chloride (12.5 degrees). This child aimed the spray directly toward his skin, thus producing a deep frostbite. We wish to draw the attention of clinicians to this potential hazard with new propellants, since they should soon replace chlorohydrofluorocarbons throughout the world for ecologic reasons.
|
Authors | M Lacour, C Le Coultre |
Journal | Pediatric dermatology
(Pediatr Dermatol)
Vol. 8
Issue 3
Pg. 207-9
(Sep 1991)
ISSN: 0736-8046 [Print] United States |
PMID | 1745629
(Publication Type: Case Reports, Journal Article)
|
Chemical References |
- Aerosol Propellants
- Butanes
- Propane
|
Topics |
- Aerosol Propellants
(adverse effects, analysis)
- Butanes
(adverse effects, analysis)
- Child
- Frostbite
(chemically induced)
- Humans
- Male
- Propane
(adverse effects, analysis)
|