SearchDictionaryMobileLogin

Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, compared with the sulfonylurea, glipizide, in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin alone: a randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.

AbstractAIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin vs. glipizide in patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycaemic control [haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) > or = 6.5 and < or = 10%] on metformin monotherapy. METHODS: After a metformin dose titration/stabilization period (> or = 1500 mg/day), 1172 patients were randomized to the addition of sitagliptin 100 mg q.d. (N = 588) or glipizide 5 mg/day (uptitrated to a potential maximum 20 mg/day) (N = 584) for 52 weeks. The primary analysis assessed whether sitagliptin was non-inferior to glipizide regarding HbA(1c) changes from baseline at Week 52 using a per-protocol approach. RESULTS: From a mean baseline of 7.5%, HbA(1c) changes from baseline were -0.67% at Week 52 in both groups, confirming non-inferiority. The proportions achieving an HbA(1c) < 7% were 63% (sitagliptin) and 59% (glipizide). Fasting plasma glucose changes from baseline were -0.56 mmol/l (-10.0 mg/dl) and -0.42 mmol/l (-7.5 mg/dl) for sitagliptin and glipizide, respectively. The proportion of patients experiencing hypoglycaemia episodes was significantly (p < 0.001) higher with glipizide (32%) than with sitagliptin (5%), with 657 events in glipizide-treated patients compared with 50 events in sitagliptin-treated patients. Sitagliptin led to weight loss (change from baseline =-1.5 kg) compared with weight gain (+1.1 kg) with glipizide [between-treatment difference (95% confidence interval) =-2.5 kg (-3.1, -2.0); p < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the addition of sitagliptin compared with glipizide provided similar HbA(1c)-lowering efficacy over 52 weeks in patients on ongoing metformin therapy. Sitagliptin was generally well tolerated, with a lower risk of hypoglycaemia relative to glipizide and with weight loss compared with weight gain with glipizide.
AuthorsM A Nauck, G Meininger, D Sheng, L Terranella, P P Stein, Sitagliptin Study 024 Group (Affiliation: Diabeteszentrum Bad Lauterberg im Harz, Bad Lauterberg, Germany.)
JournalDiabetes, obesity & metabolism (Diabetes Obes Metab) Vol. 9 Issue 2 Pg. 194-205 (Mar 2007) ISSN: 1462-8902 England
PMID17300595 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Blood Glucose
  • Hemoglobin A, Glycosylated
  • Hypoglycemic Agents
  • Protease Inhibitors
  • Pyrazines
  • Triazoles
  • hemoglobin A1c protein, human
  • sitagliptin
  • Insulin
  • Glipizide
  • Metformin
  • Antigens, CD26
  • DPP4 protein, human
Topics
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Antigens, CD26 (antagonists & inhibitors)
  • Blood Glucose (metabolism)
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 (blood, drug therapy)
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Glipizide (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Hemoglobin A, Glycosylated (metabolism)
  • Humans
  • Hypoglycemic Agents (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Insulin (blood)
  • Male
  • Metformin (therapeutic use)
  • Middle Aged
  • Protease Inhibitors (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Pyrazines (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Triazoles (adverse effects, therapeutic use)