SearchDictionaryMobileLogin

Short-term indwelling catheters (a systematic review): evidence for a primarily nursing decision.

AbstractProgram Overview: Urinary tract infection is the most common infection acquired by patients in hospital. The major associated cause is the presence of indwelling urinary catheters. A variety of specialised urethral catheters have been specifically designed to reduce the risk of infection. These include antiseptic impregnated catheters and antibiotic impregnated catheters. Catheter choice or selection is primarily a nursing decision, and nurses also take a leading role in decision-making regarding catheters purchased for hospitals. Methods: A systematic review (including metanalyses) was completed with the Cochrane Incontinence Review Group. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria: antiseptic impregnated catheters versus standard catheters, which included silver oxide (n = 3 trials) and silver alloy (n = 8 trials), antibiotic impregnated catheters versus standard catheters (n = 1 trial), and comparisons of different types of standard catheters (n = 6 trials). Results: Silver oxide catheters were not found to prevent bacteriuria in short-term catheterised hospitalised adults (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.13). Silver alloy catheters were found to significantly reduce the incidence of asymptomatic bacteriuria (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.52.) in hospitalised adults catheterised for less than 1 week. At greater than 1-week catheterization, the risk of asymptomatic bacteriuria was still reduced with the use of silver alloy catheters (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.90). The risk of symptomatic urinary tract infection was also found to be reduced with the use of silver alloy catheters (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.73). Silver alloy indwelling catheters appear to reduce the risk of catheter-acquired urinary tract infection in hospitalised adults catheterised short term. Cost-benefit analyses indicate that compensation for increased cost of silver alloy catheters would come from the reduction in the cost of catheter-acquired urinary tract infection. Conclusions: This review provides not only nurses and nurse managers, but also other health professionals with evidence of effectiveness to influence catheter choice.
AuthorsJane Elizabeth Brosnahan, Bridie Kent (Affiliation: Centre for Evidence Based Nursing Aotearoa, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.)
JournalWorldviews on evidence-based nursing / Sigma Theta Tau International, Honor Society of Nursing (Worldviews Evid Based Nurs) Vol. 1 Issue 4 Pg. 228 ( 2004) ISSN: 1545-102X United States
PMID17166156 (Publication Type: Journal Article)