A prospective randomised controlled trial to determine the early and late reactions after the use of iopamidol 340 (Niopam) and iomeprol 350 (Iomeron) in cardiac catheterisation.

Abstract

UNLABELLED:

A new generation of intravascular contrast agents, the non-ionic monomers have safety profiles that are superior to those of older ionic compounds. There are, however, significant differences between these agents.

AIM:

The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of early (<24h) and late (>24h to 7 days) reactions to two non-ionic contrast agents currently used during cardiac catheterisation: iopamidol 340 (Niopam Bracco UK Ltd.) and iomeprol 350 (Iomeron Bracco UK Ltd.).

METHODS:

This was a prospective, randomised, double blinded trial. One thousand nine hundred and eighty-five patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation received one of the following contrast agents on a weekly basis: iopamidol 340 (Niopam) and iomeprol 350 (Iomeron). Reactions that were possibly related to the contrast agents were recorded on predefined data collection forms during the first 24h of the procedure (early reaction) and after 24h to 7 days (late reaction) by means of a questionnaire.

RESULTS:

The baseline characteristics were matched in both the groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of heat sensation experienced between the two groups (p=0.1). Early non-heat reactions occurred in 2.7% of patients receiving iopamidol 340 (Niopam) and 4% of those receiving iomeprol 350 (Iomeron) (p=0.1). Significant electrocardiographic changes were recorded in 1.7% of patients who received iopamidol 340 (Niopam), and 1% of those who received iomeprol 350 (Iomeron) (p=0.2). Bradycardia occurred more frequently in the iopamidol 350 group (0.8%) compared to the iomeprol 350 group (0.1%) p=0.02. Late reactions occurred in 16.2% of those receiving iopamidol 340 (Niopam) and 21.7% of those receiving iomeprol 350 (Iomeron) (p=0.02). A total of 23 (3.7%) patients in the iopamidol group and 39 (6.2%) patients in the iomeprol group reported nausea, p=0.01.

CONCLUSIONS:

The incidence of early adverse reactions was similar with the two non-ionic contrast agents. Although bradycardia was slightly more frequent using iopamidol 340, nausea was reported more commonly 24h after the procedure in patients receiving Iomeron 350 (Iomeron). We conclude that there were only minor clinical differences between these agents; both are safe and well tolerated.

• Authors: Kunadian Vijayalakshmi, Babu Kunadian, Robert A Wright, James A Hall, Michael J Stewart, Adrian Davies, Andrew Sutton, Mark A de Belder
• Journal: European journal of radiology (Eur J Radiol) Vol. 61 Issue 2 Pg. 342-50 (Feb 2007) ISSN: 0720-048X [Print] Ireland
• PMID: 17101256 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)

Chemical References

• Contrast Media
• iomeprol
• Iopamidol

Topics

• Adult
• Aged
• Aged, 80 and over
• Bradycardia (chemically induced)
• Cardiac Catheterization (adverse effects)
• Contrast Media (administration & dosage, adverse effects)
• Double-Blind Method
• Electrocardiography
• Female
• Hot Temperature
• Humans
• Injections, Intravenous
• Iopamidol (administration & dosage, adverse effects, analogs & derivatives)
• Male
• Middle Aged
• Nausea (chemically induced)
• Prospective Studies
• Time Factors