HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Ten years of experience with weekly chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients: multivariate analysis of prognostic factors.

Abstract
Weekly chemotherapy administration represents an emerging option for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. In order to identify clinical and biological prognostic factors for outcome, we performed a multivariate analysis in a 10-year experience of weekly chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer patients. The original databases of phase II trials of metastatic breast cancer patients who had undergone first-line weekly chemotherapy were collected. Clinical and biological covariables were screened for a possible relationship with time to progression and overall survival in a Cox model. From 1990 to 2003, 184 patients were enrolled in three consecutive phase II studies, to evaluate activity and tolerability of weekly epirubicin with lonidamine or vinorelbine or paclitaxel. All patients were evaluable for clinical variables; histological samples were available in 40 patients. At a median follow-up of 24 months, median time to progression was 9 months (95% confidence interval 8-10) and median overall survival was 34 months (95% confidence interval 24-42). Independent variables were response (hazard ratio 2.34, P<0.0001), receptor status (hazard ratio 1.62, P=0.01) and performance status (hazard ratio 2.31, P<0.0001) for time to progression, and response (hazard ratio 1.86, P=0.005), performance status (hazard ratio 2.81, P<0.0001), dominant metastatic site (hazard ratio 2.27, P<0.0001) and enrollment period (hazard ratio 2.51, P=0.001) for overall survival. Although no biological factors were entered into the Cox model owing to the small sample size, some subpopulations showed a negative trend in survival. In our series of patients who had undergone weekly chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer, independent prognostic factors for survival improvement were responders, performance status 0-1, nonvisceral dominant metastatic site and enrollment period. A greater sample population is needed to extensively screen for biological prognostic factors.
AuthorsCecilia Nisticò, Federica Cuppone, Emilio Bria, Monica Fornier, Diana Giannarelli, Marcella Mottolese, Flavia Novelli, Guido Natoli, Francesco Cognetti, Edmondo Terzoli
JournalAnti-cancer drugs (Anticancer Drugs) Vol. 17 Issue 10 Pg. 1193-200 (Nov 2006) ISSN: 0959-4973 [Print] England
PMID17075319 (Publication Type: Evaluation Study, Journal Article)
Chemical References
  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Biomarkers, Tumor
Topics
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Antineoplastic Agents (administration & dosage)
  • Biomarkers, Tumor (analysis)
  • Breast Neoplasms (diagnosis, drug therapy, mortality, pathology)
  • Carcinoma (diagnosis, drug therapy, mortality, pathology)
  • Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic
  • Disease Progression
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Neoplasm Metastasis (diagnosis, drug therapy)
  • Prognosis
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Survival Analysis

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: