Abstract | BACKGROUND: METHODS: A randomized, multicentre, open-label trial in which 983 women were treated (intent-to-treat population) with NuvaRing or the COC for 13 cycles. RESULTS:
Breakthrough bleeding or spotting during cycles 2-13 was in general less frequent with NuvaRing than that with the COC (4.7-10.4%) and showed a statistically significant odds ratio of 0.61 (95% confidence interval: 0.46, 0.80) with longitudinal analysis. Intended bleeding was significantly better for all cycles with NuvaRing (55.2-68.5%) than that with the COC (35.6-56.6%) (P < 0.01). Changes from baseline in mean bodyweight and body composition parameters were relatively small for both groups with no notable between-group differences. CONCLUSION:
NuvaRing was associated with better cycle control than the COC, and there was no clinically relevant difference between the two groups in bodyweight.
|
Authors | I Milsom, I Lete, A Bjertnaes, K Rokstad, I Lindh, C J Gruber, M H Birkhäuser, E Aubeny, T Knudsen, C Bastianelli |
Journal | Human reproduction (Oxford, England)
(Hum Reprod)
Vol. 21
Issue 9
Pg. 2304-11
(Sep 2006)
ISSN: 0268-1161 [Print] England |
PMID | 16763008
(Publication Type: Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
|
Chemical References |
- Androstenes
- Contraceptives, Oral
- Drug Combinations
- NuvaRing
- etonogestrel
- Ethinyl Estradiol
- Desogestrel
- drospirenone
|
Topics |
- Administration, Oral
- Adult
- Androstenes
(administration & dosage)
- Body Composition
- Body Weight
- Contraceptive Devices, Female
- Contraceptives, Oral
(therapeutic use)
- Desogestrel
(administration & dosage, analogs & derivatives)
- Drug Combinations
- Ethinyl Estradiol
(administration & dosage)
- Humans
- Intrauterine Devices
- Menstrual Cycle
(drug effects)
- Patient Compliance
|