Abstract | BACKGROUND: METHODS: A prospective randomized trial was performed on 45 patients who underwent cesarean section during a 5-year period. Among these patients, 24 patients were operated on by closure of the peritoneum and 21 patients were operated on by the non-closure method. Overall, 31 patients had a second pregnancy and cesarean section within the time of the study. These patients were evaluated to determine if they had any adhesion between the omentum and abdominal wall or uterus or between the uterus and abdominal wall or rectus muscle. RESULTS: The two groups were similar to each other with regard to the causes of cesarean section. Seven cases of adhesions were diagnosed during subsequent cesarean sections among 13 patients (54%) with peritoneal non-closure, compared with 3 in 18 women (15%) with peritoneal closure (relative risk: 3.2; 95% confidence interval: 1.0-10.2). CONCLUSION: Closure of the peritoneum increases the operating time, but may decrease the risk of adhesions. The results of this study suggest that, during cesarean section, suture of the peritoneum may be a better option than leaving it unsutured.
|
Authors | Zahra Zareian, Parvin Zareian |
Journal | European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology
(Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol)
2006 Sep-Oct
Vol. 128
Issue 1-2
Pg. 267-9
ISSN: 0301-2115 [Print] Ireland |
PMID | 16716491
(Publication Type: Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
|
Topics |
- Cesarean Section
(adverse effects, methods, rehabilitation)
- Female
- Humans
- Peritoneum
(surgery)
- Postoperative Complications
(etiology)
- Pregnancy
- Tissue Adhesions
(etiology, surgery)
- Wound Healing
(physiology)
|