A systematic review of readability and comprehension instruments used for print and web-based cancer information.

Abstract

Adequate functional literacy skills positively influence individuals' ability to take control of their health. Print and Web-based cancer information is often written at difficult reading levels. This systematic review evaluates readability instruments (FRE, F-K, Fog, SMOG, Fry) used to assess print and Web-based cancer information and word recognition and comprehension tests (Cloze, REALM, TOFHLA, WRAT) that measure people's health literacy. Articles on readability and comprehension instruments explicitly used for cancer information were assembled by searching MEDLINE and Psyc INFO from 1993 to 2003. In all, 23 studies were included; 16 on readability, 6 on comprehension, and 1 on readability and comprehension. Of the readability investigations, 14 focused on print materials, and 2 assessed Internet information. Comprehension and word recognition measures were not applied to Web-based information. None of the formulas were designed to determine the effects of visuals or design factors that could influence readability and comprehension of cancer education information.

• Authors: Daniela B Friedman, Laurie Hoffman-Goetz
• Journal: Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education (Health Educ Behav) Vol. 33 Issue 3 Pg. 352-73 (Jun 2006) ISSN: 1090-1981 [Print] United States
• PMID: 16699125 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review, Systematic Review)

Topics

• Comprehension
• Humans
• Internet
• Mass Media
• Medical Informatics (standards)
• Neoplasms