HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

The analgesic efficacy of intravenous versus oral tramadol for preventing postoperative pain after third molar surgery.

AbstractPURPOSE:
The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of single-dose preoperative intravenous versus oral tramadol for preventing pain after third molar surgery.
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
Seventy-two patients undergoing elective third molar surgery were randomized to receive either intravenous (n = 36) or oral (n = 36) tramadol 50 mg. The intravenous group received an oral placebo capsule followed by intravenous tramadol 50 mg preoperatively. The oral tramadol group received a 50-mg oral tramadol capsule followed by intravenous placebo saline preoperatively. In both groups, a standard intravenous sedation technique was administered and the impacted third molars were removed under local anesthesia. The difference in postoperative pain was assessed by 4 primary end points: hourly pain intensity as measured by a 100-mm visual analog scale for 8 hours, time to rescue analgesic, postoperative acetaminophen consumption, and a 5-point global assessment scale (0 = poor, 1 = fair, 2 = good, 3 = very good, and 4 = excellent).
RESULTS:
Throughout the 8-hour investigation period, patients reported significantly lower pain intensity scores in the intravenous versus oral group (15.9 +/- 9.6 mm versus 36.9 +/- 17.2 mm, P = .03). Patients also reported significantly longer time to rescue analgesic (7.0 hours versus 3.5 hours, P = .00001), lesser postoperative acetaminophen consumption (1,823 +/- 1,266 mg versus 3,558 +/- 1,418 mg, P = .000006), and better global assessment (2.6 +/- 0.9 versus 1.1 +/- 0.8, P = .01) for the intravenous versus oral group.
CONCLUSIONS:
We conclude that preoperative intravenous tramadol is superior to oral tramadol for preventing postoperative pain following third molar surgery. However, it should be noted that there is a difference in the bioavailability between the 2 formulations of up to 30%, which may explain the findings.
AuthorsCliff K S Ong, Phillip Lirk, Juliana M H Tan, Belle W Y Sow
JournalJournal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (J Oral Maxillofac Surg) Vol. 63 Issue 8 Pg. 1162-8 (Aug 2005) ISSN: 0278-2391 [Print] United States
PMID16094585 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
  • Analgesics, Opioid
  • Placebos
  • Acetaminophen
  • Tramadol
Topics
  • Acetaminophen (therapeutic use)
  • Administration, Oral
  • Adult
  • Analgesics, Non-Narcotic (therapeutic use)
  • Analgesics, Opioid (administration & dosage)
  • Anesthesia, Dental
  • Anesthesia, Local
  • Conscious Sedation
  • Elective Surgical Procedures
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Injections, Intravenous
  • Male
  • Molar, Third (surgery)
  • Pain Measurement
  • Pain, Postoperative (prevention & control)
  • Placebos
  • Premedication
  • Tooth Extraction (adverse effects)
  • Tooth, Impacted (surgery)
  • Tramadol (administration & dosage)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: