HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Duration of orthodontic treatment and mandibular lengthening by means of distraction or bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in patients with Angle Class II malocclusions.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
The purpose of this study was to investigate the duration of treatment of patients with skeletal Angle Class II malocclusions treated with orthodontic appliances and surgical lengthening of the mandible to close residual overjets.
METHODS:
In this retrospective study, the patients were divided into 3 groups. Group A consisted of 10 patients (5 boys, 5 girls; mean age, 10.11 years; range, 9.1-13.9 years at the beginning of treatment) who were treated with a headgear-activator, fixed appliances, and intraoral osteodistraction of the mandible. Group B consisted of 19 patients (10 boys, 9 girls; mean age, 12.3 years; range, 9.6-16.1 years) treated with fixed appliances and intraoral distraction. In group C, 13 patients (4 men, 9 women; mean age, 27.3 years; range, 12.11-40.7 years) were treated with fixed appliances and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO).
RESULTS:
In patients treated with orthodontic appliances and surgical lengthening of the mandible, treatment time was influenced by the appliances and the surgical technique used. Patients treated with a headgear-activator, fixed appliances, and intraoral distraction osteogenesis (group A) needed significantly more treatment time than patients treated with fixed orthodontic appliances and intraoral distraction (group B) or fixed appliances and BSSO (group C). Duration of treatment with intraoral mandibular distraction (group B) was significantly (P < .05) shorter compared with mandibular lengthening with BSSO (group C). However, no definitive conclusions can be drawn, because of the retrospective study design.
CONCLUSIONS:
The best time and the best surgical procedure for correcting mandibular length have yet to be determined, and a prospective randomized trial is recommended.
AuthorsK Hero Breuning, Peter J van Strijen, Birte Prahl-Andersen, D Bram Tuinzing
JournalAmerican journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop) Vol. 127 Issue 1 Pg. 25-9 (Jan 2005) ISSN: 0889-5406 [Print] United States
PMID15643411 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Evaluation Study, Journal Article)
Topics
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Child
  • Extraoral Traction Appliances
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Length of Stay
  • Male
  • Malocclusion, Angle Class II (surgery)
  • Mandible (surgery)
  • Mandibular Advancement (methods)
  • Orthodontics, Corrective (instrumentation)
  • Osteogenesis, Distraction
  • Osteotomy
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Time Factors

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: