Abstract | BACKGROUND: METHOD: RESULTS: Of the 77 patients, 67 (87%) completed the trial, of whom 35 (52%) responded. No significant differences in response between both drugs were observed. Seventeen (44%) of 39 patients responded to tranylcypromine and 18 (47%) of 38 to phenelzine (> or = 50% reduction in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D] score). The mean reduction in HAM-D score was 10.4 +/- 8.3 for the tranylcypromine sample versus 8.3 +/- 8.4 for the phenelzine-treated patients. Only a few patients (10%) used concomitant psychotropic medication. A substantial number of patients experienced severe side effects, mainly dizziness, agitation, and insomnia; the incidence was the same in both samples (21%). CONCLUSION:
|
Authors | Tom K Birkenhäger, Walter W van den Broek, Paul G Mulder, Jan A Bruijn, Peter Moleman |
Journal | The Journal of clinical psychiatry
(J Clin Psychiatry)
Vol. 65
Issue 11
Pg. 1505-10
(Nov 2004)
ISSN: 0160-6689 [Print] United States |
PMID | 15554763
(Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
|
Chemical References |
- Antidepressive Agents
- Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors
- Tranylcypromine
- Phenelzine
|
Topics |
- Antidepressive Agents
(pharmacology)
- Depressive Disorder
(drug therapy, psychology)
- Double-Blind Method
- Drug Resistance
- Humans
- Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors
(therapeutic use)
- Phenelzine
(therapeutic use)
- Tranylcypromine
(adverse effects, therapeutic use)
- Treatment Outcome
|