Abstract | BACKGROUND: Two recent studies have provided opposite results on the efficacy of naltrexone on uremic pruritus. We have performed a third study. OBJECTIVE: PATIENTS/METHODS: Among 296 hemodialyzed patients, 65 suffered from uremic pruritus. Fifty-two patients participated in the study. The patients were treated for 2 weeks with naltrexone (50 mg/day; 26 patients) or loratadine (10 mg/day; 26 patients), after a washout of 48 h. Pruritus intensity was scored by a visual analogue scale (VAS). Adverse events were carefully searched for. The two groups were statistically equivalent. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the mean VAS scores after treatment, but naltrexone allowed a dramatic decrease in VAS scores (Delta >3/10) in 7 patients. Adverse events (mainly nausea and sleep disturbances) were observed in 10/26 patients. CONCLUSIONS:
Naltrexone is effective only in a subset of patients. Adverse events are very frequent. The differences of efficacy and tolerance between patients might be due to metabolism. Naltrexone might be considered as a second-line treatment.
|
Authors | Emmanuelle Legroux-Crespel, Jacques Clèdes, Laurent Misery |
Journal | Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland)
(Dermatology)
Vol. 208
Issue 4
Pg. 326-30
( 2004)
ISSN: 1018-8665 [Print] Switzerland |
PMID | 15178915
(Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
|
Copyright | Copyright 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel |
Chemical References |
- Antipruritics
- Naltrexone
- Loratadine
|
Topics |
- Antipruritics
(administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
- Drug Administration Schedule
- Female
- Humans
- Loratadine
(administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Naltrexone
(administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
- Pruritus
(drug therapy, pathology)
- Surveys and Questionnaires
- Treatment Outcome
- Uremia
(drug therapy, pathology)
|