HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

The use of complementary and alternative medical providers by insured cancer patients in Washington State.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Insurance coverage of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is expanding. However, to the authors' knowledge, little is know concerning CAM utilization among cancer patients under the insurance model of financing. In this study, the authors evaluated CAM provider utilization by cancer patients in a state that requires the inclusion of alternative practitioners in private, commercial insurance products.
METHODS:
An analysis was carried out of year 2000 claims data from two large Washington State insurance companies.
RESULTS:
Of 357,709 claimants, 7915 claimants (2.3%) had a cancer diagnosis. Among cancer patients, 7.1% had a claim for naturopathy, acupuncture, or massage; and 11.6% had a claim for chiropractic during the study year. The use of naturopathy (odds ratio [OR], 2.0; P<0.001) and acupuncture (OR, 1.4; P<0.001) were more common, and the use of chiropractic was less common (OR, 0.9; P<0.001) for cancer patients compared with those without cancer. No significant differences were noted in the use of massage between the two groups. Except in 2 individuals (0.03%), cancer patients also had at least 1 conventional provider claim during the year. Factors associated with nonchiropractic alternative provider use were female gender, the presence of metastatic cancer, hematologic malignancy, and the use of chemotherapy. Increased use of naturopathic physicians accounted for much of this trend. Musculoskeletal pain was the most common diagnosis at the CAM provider visit. Billed amounts for alternative services were <2% of the overall medical bills for cancer patients.
CONCLUSIONS:
A substantial number of insured cancer patients will use alternative providers if they are given the choice. The cost of this treatment is modest compared with conventional care charges. For individuals with cancer, CAM providers do not appear to be replacing conventional providers but instead are integrated into overall care.
AuthorsWilliam E Lafferty, Allen Bellas, Andrea Corage Baden, Patrick Timothy Tyree, Leanna J Standish, Ruth Patterson
JournalCancer (Cancer) Vol. 100 Issue 7 Pg. 1522-30 (Apr 01 2004) ISSN: 0008-543X [Print] United States
PMID15042688 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.)
CopyrightCopyright 2004 American Cancer Society.
Topics
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Complementary Therapies (statistics & numerical data)
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Insurance, Health, Reimbursement (economics)
  • Logistic Models
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasms (therapy)
  • Washington

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: