Abstract | BACKGROUND: METHODS: Eighty-four patients undergoing Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia (100 mg of hyperbaric lidocaine 5% plus morphine 0.2 mg) were randomly allocated to one of two groups. Just after birth, alizapride-50 mg ( alizapride group) or metoclopramide-10 mg ( metoclopramide group) were injected i.v. Patients were assessed after surgery for pruritus (absent, mild, moderate or severe) or other untoward symptoms. RESULTS: In the metoclopramide group, pruritus was absent in 5 (12%) patients, mild in 23 (55%), moderate in 11 (26%), and severe in 3 (7%), while in the alizapride group, these incidences were, respectively, 5 (12%), 33 (79%), 4 (10%), and 0 (P=0.045, chi(2)-test). There was no difference in the incidence of side-effects, which were all minor. CONCLUSIONS:
|
Authors | M L Horta, P T G Vianna |
Journal | British journal of anaesthesia
(Br J Anaesth)
Vol. 91
Issue 2
Pg. 287-9
(Aug 2003)
ISSN: 0007-0912 [Print] England |
PMID | 12878632
(Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
|
Chemical References |
- Analgesics, Opioid
- Antiemetics
- Antipruritics
- Pyrrolidines
- Morphine
- alizapride
|
Topics |
- Analgesics, Opioid
(adverse effects)
- Anesthesia, Obstetrical
(adverse effects, methods)
- Anesthesia, Spinal
(adverse effects)
- Antiemetics
(therapeutic use)
- Antipruritics
(therapeutic use)
- Cesarean Section
- Double-Blind Method
- Female
- Humans
- Morphine
(adverse effects)
- Pruritus
(chemically induced, prevention & control)
- Pyrrolidines
(therapeutic use)
- Severity of Illness Index
|