Abstract | BACKGROUND: METHODS: We evaluated the efficacy of resistive-heating, comparing to circulating-water mattress and forced-air warming system. Twenty four patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery were randomly assigned to warming with: 1) a circulating water mattress, 2) a lower-body forced-air system, or 3) a carbon-fiber, resistive-heating blanket. RESULTS: Tympanic membrane temperature in the first two hours of surgery decreased by 1.9 +/- 0.5 degrees C in the water mattress group, 1.0 +/- 0.6 degree C in the forced-air group, 0.8 +/- 0.2 degree C in the resistive-heating group. The decreases in core temperature by the end of surgery were 2.0 +/- 0.8 degrees C in the water mattress group, 0.6 +/- 1.1 degrees C in the forced-air group, and 0.5 +/- 0.4 degree C in the resistive blanket group, respectively. There was no significant difference in the changes of core temperature between the forced-air group and the resistive-heating group. No side effects related to resistive-heating blanket were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Even during major abdominal surgery, carbon-fiber resistive-heating maintains core temperature as effectively as forced air.
|
Authors | Kenji Hasegawa, Chiharu Negishi, Fumitoshi Nakagawa, Shihoko Mukai, Makoto Ozaki |
Journal | Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology
(Masui)
Vol. 52
Issue 6
Pg. 636-41
(Jun 2003)
ISSN: 0021-4892 [Print] Japan |
PMID | 12854480
(Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
|
Chemical References |
|
Topics |
- Abdomen
(surgery)
- Aged
- Anesthesia, General
- Bedding and Linens
- Body Temperature Regulation
- Carbon
(therapeutic use)
- Carbon Fiber
- Heating
(instrumentation, methods)
- Humans
- Hypothermia
(prevention & control)
- Middle Aged
- Monitoring, Intraoperative
- Rewarming
(methods)
|