HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Wear and deformation of ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip replacements with joint laxity and swing phase microseparation.

Abstract
Wear of polyethylene and the resulting wear debris-induced osteolysis remains a major cause of long-term failure in artificial hip joints. There is interest in understanding engineering and clinical conditions that influence wear rates. Fluoroscopic studies have shown separation of the head and the cup during the swing phase of walking due to joint laxity. In ceramic-on-ceramic hips, joint laxity and microseparation, which leads to contact of the head on the superior rim of the cup, has led to localized damage and increased wear in vivo and in vitro. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of joint laxity and microseparation on the wear of ceramic on polyethylene artificial hip joints in an in vitro simulator. Microseparation during the swing phase of the walking cycle produced contact of the ceramic head on the rim of the polyethylene acetabular cup that deformed the softer polyethylene cup. No damage to the alumina ceramic femoral head was found. Under standard simulator conditions the volume change of the moderately crosslinked polyethylene cups was 25.6 +/- 5.3 mm3/million cycles and this reduced to 5.6 +/- 4.2 mm3/million cycles under microseparation conditions. Testing under microseparation conditions caused the rim of the polyethylene cup to deform locally, possibly due to creep, and the volume change of the polyethylene cup when the head relocated was substantially reduced, possibly due to improved lubrication. Joint laxity may be caused by poor soft tissue tension or migration and subsidence of components. In ceramic-on-polyethylene acetabular cups wear was decreased with a small degree of joint laxity, while in contrast in hard-on-hard alumina bearings, microseparation accelerated wear. These findings may have significant implications for the choice of fixation systems to be used for different types of bearing couples.
AuthorsS Williams, M Butterfield, T Stewart, E Ingham, M Stone, J Fisher
JournalProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine (Proc Inst Mech Eng H) Vol. 217 Issue 2 Pg. 147-53 ( 2003) ISSN: 0954-4119 [Print] England
PMID12666782 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Evaluation Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Polyethylenes
  • ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene
Topics
  • Ceramics
  • Compressive Strength
  • Elasticity
  • Equipment Failure Analysis (instrumentation, methods)
  • Femur (physiopathology)
  • Friction
  • Hip Joint (physiopathology)
  • Hip Prosthesis
  • Humans
  • Joint Instability (etiology, physiopathology)
  • Lubrication
  • Materials Testing
  • Motion
  • Osteolysis (etiology, physiopathology)
  • Polyethylenes
  • Prosthesis Design (methods)
  • Prosthesis Failure
  • Viscosity
  • Walking
  • Weight-Bearing

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: