Abstract | AIM: METHODS: RESULTS: The linear ranges of I and II were 0.0842-0.842 and 0.842 and 0.0940-0.940 mg.mL-1 respectively, the correlation coefficient were 0.9966 and 0.9957, the average recoveries were 95.6% (RSD = 4.0%, n = 5) and 95.0% (RSD = 4.4%, n = 5), the RSDs (n = 5) of measurement precision test were 2.2% and 1.7%, the RSDs (n = 6) of reproduction test were 5.4% and 4.0% respectively. The contents of I and II were obviously interrelated with the variety and characteristics of Fructus Chebulae, the contents of I and II in the confusion varieties of Fructus Chebulae were very low. CONCLUSION: It is suitable to use I and II as the criterion in quality evaluation of Fructus Chebulae, and the HPCE method is effective for quality evaluation of the crude Fructus Chebulae.
|
Authors | G Ding, Y R Lu, C R Ji, Y Z Liu |
Journal | Yao xue xue bao = Acta pharmaceutica Sinica
(Yao Xue Xue Bao)
Vol. 36
Issue 4
Pg. 292-5
(Apr 2001)
ISSN: 0513-4870 [Print] China |
PMID | 12580059
(Publication Type: English Abstract, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
|
Chemical References |
- Benzopyrans
- Glucosides
- Hydrolyzable Tannins
- Tannins
- chebulinic acid
- chebulagic acid
|
Topics |
- Benzopyrans
(analysis)
- Drug Contamination
- Electrophoresis, Capillary
- Fruit
(chemistry)
- Glucosides
(analysis)
- Hydrolyzable Tannins
- Plants, Medicinal
(chemistry, classification)
- Quality Control
- Tannins
(analysis)
- Terminalia
(chemistry, classification)
|