HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Reliability and efficacy of metoprolol and diltiazem in patients having mild to moderate mitral stenosis with sinus rhythm.

Abstract
The authors evaluated the effects of beta blockers (metoprolol) and calcium channel blockers (diltiazem) in patients having mild to moderate mitral stenosis (MS) with sinus rhythm. Eighty patients with a complaint of dyspnea with diagnosed MS were included in this study. Patients were randomized into metoprolol and diltiazem groups. The first group received oral diltiazem treatment for 3 months following an i.v. dose of 25 mg diltiazem. The second group received oral metoprolol for 3 months following an i.v. dose of 5 mg metoprolol. All patients performed a treadmill exercise test at the beginning of and after 3 months of treatment. Transthoracic echocardiographic studies were also performed following the i.v. drug administration and after 3 months of treatment. In addition, oxygen uptakes of patients were measured before and after the stress and after 3 months of treatment. Decreases in peak gradient (PG) and mean transmitral gradient (MG) were observed in the metoprolol group after i.v. and oral metoprolol treatment. A prolongation of exercise time in treadmill exercise test (TET) and a decrease in the maximum heart rate after oral metoprolol treatment were noted. Eighteen patients in the metoprolol group had benefited symptomatically from this treatment and complaints of dyspnea were alleviated, whereas no symptomatic relief was seen in the diltiazem group. No significant prolongation was observed in effort times (p>0.05) of the diltiazem group. Transmitral gradients measured via echocardiographic examination did not change (p>0.05). With respect to oxygen uptake rates, a statistically significant decrease was determined in the metoprolol group, whereas no difference was found in diltiazem group. The authors conclude that metoprolol may be useful in patients with MS and can provide symptomatic relief. They did not observe any beneficial effect of diltiazem in these patients.
AuthorsSait Alan, Mehmet S Ulgen, Kurtulus Ozdemir, Telat Keles, Nizamettin Toprak
JournalAngiology (Angiology) 2002 Sep-Oct Vol. 53 Issue 5 Pg. 575-81 ISSN: 0003-3197 [Print] United States
PMID12365866 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
Chemical References
  • Adrenergic beta-Antagonists
  • Calcium Channel Blockers
  • Diltiazem
  • Metoprolol
Topics
  • Administration, Oral
  • Adrenergic beta-Antagonists (administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
  • Adult
  • Calcium Channel Blockers (administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical
  • Diltiazem (administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
  • Dyspnea (drug therapy)
  • Echocardiography
  • Exercise Test
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Heart Rate
  • Hemodynamics
  • Humans
  • Injections, Intravenous
  • Male
  • Metoprolol (administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
  • Middle Aged
  • Mitral Valve Stenosis (drug therapy, physiopathology)
  • Oxygen Consumption
  • Time Factors

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: