Abstract |
The insect repellent N, N-diethylphenyl acetamide (DEPA) was compared with neem oil, a commercial preparation, for protection against 3 day old un-fed female of the sandfly, Phlebotomus papatasi, (Diptera: Psychodidae) under laboratory conditions on mouse. The percentage protection against sandfly bite provided by neem oil was significantly higher than DEPA when applied at 1% and 2% concentrations (p = 0.000, t = 21.474; df = 6 and p = 0.001, t = 5.960; df = 6 respectively). However, neem oil did not show any significant difference with DEPA at 5% (p = 0.1682, t = 0.15667; df = 6). This clearly indicates that at higher concentration (5%) both neem oil and DEPA exhibited similar repellent action against P. papatasi.
|
Authors | R Srinivasan, M Kalyanasundaram |
Journal | The Journal of communicable diseases
(J Commun Dis)
Vol. 33
Issue 3
Pg. 180-4
(Sep 2001)
ISSN: 0019-5138 [Print] India |
PMID | 12206037
(Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article)
|
Chemical References |
- Acetamides
- Acetanilides
- Glycerides
- Insect Repellents
- Terpenes
- neem oil
- N,N-diethylphenylacetamide
|
Topics |
- Acetamides
(pharmacology)
- Acetanilides
- Animals
- Female
- Glycerides
(pharmacology)
- Insect Repellents
(pharmacology)
- Insect Vectors
(drug effects, physiology)
- Leishmaniasis
(parasitology, prevention & control)
- Male
- Mice
- Phlebotomus
(drug effects, physiology)
- Terpenes
(pharmacology)
|