In this article, we describe a randomised trial in which two established primary dressings -
Comfeel (Coloplast, UK) and Granuflex improved formulation (Convatec, UK) - were compared to Cutinova foam (Beiersdorf Medical, UK) in the management of venous
leg ulcers. Patients that met the study trial criteria were randomised to receive one of the three primary dressings. All
ulcers were secondarily bandaged with Comprilan (Beiersdorf Medical, UK) short-stretch compression. The three dressings were compared in terms of their ability to promote
ulcer healing (closure rate and healing rate) and reduce the prevalence and severity of
ulcer-associated
pain, over a 12-week period. The ease with which dressings could be used in a busy outpatient clinic setting was also considered. On enrollment, groups were well matched in terms of all of the patient and
ulcer parameters studies. Six patients were withdrawn for reasons unrelated to study dressings or trial procedures. Following non-parametric analysis of the study data, the three dressings were found to be equally effective at promoting
ulcer healing and alleviating
ulcer-associated
pain. Study personnel rated Cutinova Foam as easy, if not easier, to use than
Comfeel or Granuflex. This study suggests that Cutinova Foam is as safe and effective as both
Comfeel and Granuflex, in the treatment of venous
leg ulcers.