[Emergency endovascular treatment of acute aortic diseases].

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To investigate the safety and efficacy of emergency treatment of acute aortic diseases with endovascular stent grafts.

METHODS:

In 11 patients (median age 55 years, range 18 - 85) with acute complications of descending aortic diseases endovascular emergency treatment was performed: traumatic aortic rupture (n = 4), penetrating ulcer with aortobronchial fistula or hematothorax (n = 4), acute type B dissection (n = 2, one with penetration, one with subacute mesenteric ischemia), and symptomatic aneurysm of the thoracic aorta (n = 1) with pain and diameter progression. 15 stent grafts were implanted (Talent n = 11, Vanguard/Stentor n = 4). Stent extension was necessary in 4 cases. In 2 cases graft extension was done during the first procedure (due to distal migration and due to the total length of the aortic aneurysm). In 2 cases graft extension was performed 5 days (due to a new aortic ulcer at the proximal stent struts) and 5 months after the initial procedure (recurrent aortobronchial fistula due to aneurysm progression). 14 of 15 implantations required general anesthesia, one symptomatic thoracic aneurysm was performed in local anesthesia and sedation.

RESULTS:

14 of 15 graft procedures were performed using the femoral or iliac approach. One procedure required aortofemoral bypass grafting due to extensive arteriosclerotic stenosis and the stent graft was inserted via the bypass graft. The orifice of the subclavian artery was crossed with bare stent struts in 4 cases without neurological complications. Median follow-up is 27 months (range 6 to 72 months). In traumatic aortic ruptures, immediate sealing of bleeding was achieved and follow-up is inconspicuous at a maximum of 72 months. In cases of aortobronchial fistulas, follow-up is satisfactory (maximum 72 months) despite the necessity for reintervention and graft extension. In one acute type B dissection retrograde dissection of the aortic arch occurred during stent release with stable disease during follow-up without neurological complications. In one type B dissection with mesenteric ischemia the mesenteric blood flow was restored. A second look operation confirmed pulsatile flow in the mesenteric trunk but a total necrosis of the small intestine and the patient consequently died.

CONCLUSION:

Endovascular treatment is safe and effective for emergency treatment of life-threatening complications in selected acute aortic syndromes. Mid-term results are encouraging, however, regular follow-up is mandatory to recognize late complications of the stent graft.

• Authors: M B Pitton, W Schmiedt, A Neufang, S Herber, C Düber, M Thelen
• Journal: RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin (Rofo) Vol. 174 Issue 5 Pg. 593-9 (May 2002) ISSN: 1438-9029 [Print] Germany
• Vernacular Title: Endovaskuläre Behandlung akuter Erkrankungender thorakalen Aorta.
• PMID: 11997859 (Publication Type: Journal Article)

Topics

• Acute Disease
• Adolescent
• Adult
• Aged
• Aged, 80 and over
• Aorta, Thoracic (diagnostic imaging)
• Aortic Diseases (surgery)
• Aortic Rupture (surgery)
• Emergencies
• Humans
• Middle Aged
• Radiography
• Retrospective Studies
• Safety
• Stents
• Treatment Outcome