HOMEPRODUCTSSERVICESCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaMobileSign Up FREE or Login

No-anesthesia clear corneal phacoemulsification versus topical and topical plus intracameral anesthesia. Randomized clinical trial.

AbstractPurpose: To compare the intraoperative pain scores during clear corneal phacoemulsification under no anesthesia, topical anesthesia, and topical plus intracameral anesthesia.Setting: Dr. Agarwal's Eye Hospital and Eye Research Center, Chennai, India.Methods: Seventy-five patients were randomized to have phacoemulsification under no anesthesia, topical anesthesia, or topical plus intracameral anesthesia. Uncooperative or illiterate patients and those with hard cataract, a shallow anterior chamber, or small pupils were excluded. A protocol was established for supplemental anesthesia in case of breakthrough pain during the surgery. Each patient was asked to grade the overall severity of intraoperative pain immediately after surgery on a 10-point visual analog scale. Also evaluated were the general discomfort during surgery, discomfort from the microscope lights, surgeon stress during surgery, and total surgical time. Comparison among the 3 groups was performed using an analysis of variance.Results: No supplemental anesthesia was required in any group. No significant difference was noted in the mean scores of the subjective sensation of pain with or without topical anesthesia (P =.610). The mean scores of patient discomfort from the microscope lights and surgical time were also statistically insignificant. Patient discomfort and surgeon stress during surgery were significantly greater in the no-anesthesia group than in the topical and topical plus intracameral groups (P =.0235 and P = 0.0206, respectively).Conclusion: No-anesthesia clear corneal phacoemulsification was performed by a highly experienced, skilled surgeon without causing an unacceptable level of pain. However, this technique is not suitable for every cataract surgeon or patient.
AuthorsS K Pandey, L Werner, D J Apple, A Agarwal, A Agarwal, S Agarwal (Affiliation: Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina 29425-5536, USA. pandeys at musc.edu)
JournalJournal of cataract and refractive surgery (J Cataract Refract Surg) Vol. 27 Issue 10 Pg. 1643-50 (Oct 2001) ISSN: 0886-3350 [Print] United States
PMID11687365 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
Chemical References
  • Anesthetics, Local
  • Silicone Elastomers
  • Lidocaine
Topics
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Anesthesia, Local (methods)
  • Anesthetics, Local (administration & dosage)
  • Anterior Chamber (drug effects)
  • Cornea (surgery)
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lens Implantation, Intraocular
  • Lenses, Intraocular
  • Lidocaine (administration & dosage)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pain Measurement
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Phacoemulsification (methods)
  • Prospective Studies
  • Questionnaires
  • Silicone Elastomers

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research network!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:


Research Interface PRO additionally includes drill-down to evidence, articles by author, export to Excel, FDA Link and mobile subscription:
1 year subscription, $45.00 USD