Abstract | STUDY OBJECTIVE: DESIGN: This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. The primary efficacy parameter was acute bronchodilator response. The primary end points were peak change in FEV(1) from baseline and area under the response-time curve. SETTING: Thirty-one clinical centers in the United States participated in this project. PATIENTS: A total of 507 patients with moderate-to-severe COPD were randomized, and 444 patients completed the trial. INTERVENTIONS: MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Patients in all active treatment groups had significant bronchodilator responses as shown by increases in mean FEV(1) from baseline of at least 15%. Bronchodilator response in all active treatment groups was also significantly more than their respective placebo treatments based on FEV(1), area under the time-response curve from 0 to 6 h, and peak response. FVC results were similar to those seen with FEV(1). There were no significant differences in adverse events, laboratory findings, or ECG findings among the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS:
|
Authors | J Taylor, A Kotch, K Rice, M Ghafouri, C L Kurland, N M Fagan, T J Witek Jr, Ipratropium Bromide HFA Study Group |
Journal | Chest
(Chest)
Vol. 120
Issue 4
Pg. 1253-61
(Oct 2001)
ISSN: 0012-3692 [Print] United States |
PMID | 11591569
(Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
|
Chemical References |
- Aerosol Propellants
- Chlorofluorocarbons
- Hydrocarbons, Fluorinated
- Ipratropium
- apaflurane
|
Topics |
- Adult
- Aerosol Propellants
(administration & dosage)
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Airway Resistance
(drug effects)
- Chlorofluorocarbons
(adverse effects)
- Double-Blind Method
- Female
- Forced Expiratory Volume
(drug effects)
- Humans
- Hydrocarbons, Fluorinated
(adverse effects)
- Ipratropium
(administration & dosage, adverse effects)
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Nebulizers and Vaporizers
|